Abstract

BackgroundThe RE‐DUAL PCI trial demonstrated that in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), dual therapy with dabigatran and a P2Y12 inhibitor, either clopidogrel or ticagrelor, reduced the risk of bleeding without an increased risk of thromboembolic events as compared to triple therapy with warfarin in addition to a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin. What remains unclear is whether this effect is consistent between males and females undergoing PCI.HypothesisThe reduction in risk of bleeding without increased risk of thromboembolic events with dual therapy with dabigatran and a P2Y12 inhibitor in comparison to triple therapy with warfarin, a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin is consistent in females and males.MethodsThe primary safety endpoint was the first International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding event (MBE) or clinically relevant non‐major bleeding event (CRNMBE). The efficacy endpoint was the composite of death, thromboembolic event (stroke, myocardial infarction, and systemic embolism) or unplanned revascularization. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were applied to calculate corresponding hazard ratios and interaction p values for each endpoint.ResultsA total of 655 women and 2070 men were enrolled. The risk of major or CRNM bleeding was lower with both dabigatran 110 mg dual therapy and dabigatran 150 mg dual therapy compared with warfarin triple therapy in female and male patients (for 110 mg: females: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47–1.01, males: HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.37–0.59, interaction p value: 0.084 and for 150 mg: females HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.48–1.16, males HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56–0.90, interaction p value: 0.83). There was also no detectable difference in the composite efficacy endpoint of death, thromboembolic events or unplanned revascularization between dabigatran dual therapy and warfarin triple therapy, with no statistically significant interaction between sex and treatment (interaction p values: 0.73 and 0.72, respectively).ConclusionsConsistent with the overall study results, the risk of bleeding was lower with dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg dual therapy compared with warfarin triple therapy, and risk of thromboembolic events was comparable with warfarin triple therapy independent of the patient's sex.

Highlights

  • Sex differences in treatments and outcomes are increasingly recognized in medicine, in cardiovascular medicine

  • Treatment effects of dual therapy with dabigatran dosed at 110 mg versus warfarin triple therapy were consistent for females and males for this endpoint (Figure 1)

  • Consistent treatment effects were seen for the primary endpoint with dual therapy with dabigatran dosed at 150 mg vs triple therapy with warfarin in female and male patients

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Sex differences in treatments and outcomes are increasingly recognized in medicine, in cardiovascular medicine. Previous studies suggest females are underrepresented in clinical trials, with less female-specific data in terms of drug safety and efficacy.[1,2] Women with heart disease including atrial fibrillation are older and have more co-morbidities, and the potential benefit–risk of new therapies for both adverse cardiovascular events as well as bleeding may differ.[3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] For patients with atrial fibrillation who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), this balance is important – with high risk of thrombotic events and bleeding. Exclusion criteria included patients with bioprosthetic or mechanical heart valves, severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance

| METHODS
| RESULTS
| DISCUSSION
| LIMITATIONS
Findings
| CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call