Abstract

This study uses a multi-year temporal climate analogue approach to explore zoo visitor responses to seasonal climatic anomalies and assess the impacts of projected climate change on zoo visitation in Toronto, Canada. A new method for selecting a representative weather station was introduced which ranks surrounding stations based on “climatic distance” rather than physical distance alone. Two years representing anomalously warm temperature conditions and two years representing climatically normal temperature conditions were identified for each season from within the study period from 1999 to 2015. Two years representing anomalously wet precipitation conditions and two years representing anomalously dry precipitation conditions were also identified. F-tests and t-tests were employed to determine if the apparent differences in zoo visitation between the temperature and precipitation paired groupings were statistically significant. A “selective ensemble” of seasonal Global Climate Model (GCM) output from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report was used to determine when these anomalous temperature and precipitation conditions may become the norm in the future. When anomalously warm winters and springs occurred within the historical record, total zoo visitation in those seasons increased significantly. Inversely, when anomalously warm summers occurred, total summer season zoo visitation decreased significantly. Temperature anomalies in the autumn season did not result in any significant differences in total autumn season zoo visitation. Finally, apart from in the spring season, there were no significant differences in total zoo visitation between anomalously wet and dry seasons.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIt has been acknowledged [1,2,3], and is generally accepted [4,5], that weather and climate affect behaviour and satisfaction associated with outdoor recreation and tourism

  • It has been acknowledged [1,2,3], and is generally accepted [4,5], that weather and climate affect behaviour and satisfaction associated with outdoor recreation and tourism.the relationship between weather with recreation and tourism is poorly understood and under-researched [6,7,8]

  • The results suggested that optimal thermal conditions associated with both zoos appeared to be the same (“slightly warm” or “warm”, based on Physiologically Equivalent Temperature (PET) thermal categories); thermal aversion occurred on opposite sides of the spectrum, with visitors in Atlanta avoiding extreme cold and those in Phoenix adverse to extreme heat [11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been acknowledged [1,2,3], and is generally accepted [4,5], that weather and climate affect behaviour and satisfaction associated with outdoor recreation and tourism. The relationship between weather with recreation and tourism is poorly understood and under-researched [6,7,8]. Very little is known about the specific weather sensitivity of particular tourism attractions within urban areas [9,10,11,12]. There has been a number of studies aimed at assessing the weather sensitivity of zoo visitation [9,11,12,13]. No study to Atmosphere 2016, 7, 71; doi:10.3390/atmos7050071 www.mdpi.com/journal/atmosphere

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call