Abstract

Historically, the most hotly disputed issue in mammographic screening is whether to screen the age group 40–49. The most recently published combined analysis of the randomised trials of breast cancer screening at a range of ages between 40 and 74 gives a 24% reduction in breast cancer mortality in association with invitation to screening. The most recent combined analysis of the trial results for women aged 40–49 at randomisation shows a significant 18% reduction in association with invitation to screening. The effect in those who actually receive screening may be considerably greater. Evaluation of service screening programmes similarly suggests a mortality benefit in women aged 40–49. To achieve this benefit a greater commitment of financial and human resources is required. The decision to offer organised screening before age 50 will always vary, depending on the incidence in this age group, societal attitudes and competing calls on resources. However, breast cancer control in this age group is a major issue, because the proportion of deaths due to breast cancer is higher among younger women than among older women. The age at which to stop screening is a less researched question and a more difficult one. It is clear that there is a benefit of screening women up to age 70, but how long that benefit lasts if screening ceases at age 70, and what sort of non-intensive regimen might be offered to older women is not clear. Some tentative answers to these questions are proposed.

Highlights

  • Histological analysis of core biopsy of breast lesions takes a minimum of 24 h, but imprint cytology of a core biopsy can be reported within an hour

  • A total of 450,425 women were screened by BreastScreen Western Australia (BSWA) from January 1990 to December 2000. 2,314 cancers were detected with a total cancer detection rate of 5.1 cancers per 1,000 women screened. 4,916 women of ATSI origin were screened during this interval. 31 breast cancers were diagnosed, with a total cancer detection rate of 6.3 cancers per 1,000 women screened

  • These lesions may mimic the microcalcifications of ductal carcinoma in situ at screening mammography

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Histological analysis of core biopsy of breast lesions takes a minimum of 24 h, but imprint cytology of a core biopsy can be reported within an hour. This study validates the accuracy of imprint cytology from core biopsy of breast lesions obtained under ultrasound control. Full field digital mammography (FFDM) seems set to replace conventional film-screen technique. Concern has been raised over FFDM diminished spatial resolution (5–6 Ip/mm). If valid, this could compromise detection of calcification and diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In our centre we were not able to perceive any difference between microfocus magnification and on-screen magnification when assessing microcalcification. We subsequently compared these results with average scores for over 90 film-screen mammography systems

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.