Abstract

We investigate the effect of the regime-switching transaction costs and dividends on liquidity premium and investor’s optimal strategy. With reasonably calibrated parameters, we show that counter-cyclical transaction costs substantially raise liquidity premium while pro-cyclical dividends amplify this effect. More importantly, we observe that cash dividends can no longer play a role as a liquidity provider if the volatility of pro-cyclical dividends increases. Our model provides a universal framework in the liquidity contexts, so that we can examine the effect of regime switching on liquidity premium for all combinations of regimes in transaction costs and dividends.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call