Abstract
We investigate the effect of the regime-switching transaction costs and dividends on liquidity premium and investor’s optimal strategy. With reasonably calibrated parameters, we show that counter-cyclical transaction costs substantially raise liquidity premium while pro-cyclical dividends amplify this effect. More importantly, we observe that cash dividends can no longer play a role as a liquidity provider if the volatility of pro-cyclical dividends increases. Our model provides a universal framework in the liquidity contexts, so that we can examine the effect of regime switching on liquidity premium for all combinations of regimes in transaction costs and dividends.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
