The Effect of Prosthesis Type on Intraoperative Soft-Tissue Balance and Clinical Outcomes in Modified Kinematically Aligned Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Abstract

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) has gained interest for achieving more favorable clinical outcomes than mechanically aligned TKA. One of the advantages of KA-TKA is reported to be an easy acquisition of intraoperative soft-tissue balance without excessive medial release for varus osteoarthritis. However, we hypothesized that the prosthesis type affects intraoperative soft-tissue balance even in the KA-TKA. The present study aimed to compare intraoperative soft-tissue balance and clinical outcomes of KA-TKAs using single-radius (SR) or multiradius (MR) prostheses. AND METHODS: Consecutive 70 cruciate-retaining modified KA-TKAs (31 SR and 39 MR) were performed in patients with varus-type osteoarthritis using a navigation system. Intraoperative soft-tissue balance including joint component gap and varus/valgus balance was measured with femoral component placement and patellofemoral joint reduction throughout the range of motion using offset-type tensor and compared between the two groups. Two years postoperatively, the range of motion and 2011 Knee Society Scores were compared between the two groups. Joint component gaps showed no significant differences between the two groups from 0 to 30 degrees of flexion. However, during 60 to 120 degrees of flexion, joint component gaps of SR group showed significantly larger values than those of MR group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in varus/valgus balance throughout the range of motion between the two groups. The postoperative clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups. Despite no difference in clinical outcomes, joint component gap showed different patterns due to the prosthesis type in modified KA-TKAs.