Abstract

<p>The aim of the present study is to examine the effect level of procrastination on academic achievement. To this end, a meta-analytic approach was applied and the studies published between January 2000 and May 2020 in Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and Academic Search Ultimate databases were included in the study. The research was limited to articles examining the correlation between the variables and, accordingly, the correlation coefficient was specified as an index to identify the effect size. After reviewing 22 relevant studies with 8307 participants, the meta-analysis was conducted through Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. The findings revealed that the variables were negatively correlated with each other and the overall effect size of procrastination on academic achievement was found -0.61, which can be interpreted as the medium effect size. The findings of the study endorse the main tenets of theoretical framework regarding the aforementioned link.</p>

Highlights

  • Defined as “to put off intentionally the doing of something that should be done” (Merriam-Webster, n.d.), procrastination has long been an issue of scientific research (Beutel et al, 2016; Lay, 1986; Steel & Klingsieck, 2016) and giving a specific description for the term seems quite elusive (Steel, 2007) as it holds intra-individual variability

  • The findings revealed that the variables were negatively correlated with each other and the overall effect size of procrastination on academic achievement was found -0.61, which can be interpreted as the medium effect size

  • Since 204.668 is greater than the critical level (41.401; p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Defined as “to put off intentionally the doing of something that should be done” (Merriam-Webster, n.d.), procrastination has long been an issue of scientific research (Beutel et al, 2016; Lay, 1986; Steel & Klingsieck, 2016) and giving a specific description for the term seems quite elusive (Steel, 2007) as it holds intra-individual variability (van Eerde, 2003). Solomon and Rothblum (1984) define the term as one’s delaying a task unnecessarily and needlessly to the extent that postponing the task gives a kind of personal discomfort. In this sense, individuals who frequently procrastinate do know that they have to fulfill the tasks; they fail to do so due to their tendency to delay (He, 2017). Van Eerde (2003) addresses the psychological aspects of procrastination and argues that it is broadly evaluated as a non-functional practice which brings about a feeling of guilt or committing an offense as well as poor performance

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.