Abstract

The effects of mechanical ventilation with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on hemodynamic performance and blood-gas exchange were studied in ten patients following open-heart surgery. Ventilation at constant tidal volume (15 ml/kg body weight) with 10 cm H2O PEEP following aortic valve replacement (AVR) IN FIVE PATIENTs without pulmonary vascular disease was associated with the following significant changes: a rise in arterial Po2, a fall in the alveolar-arterial Po2 gradient when Fio2 = 1.0, decreases in calculated Qs/Qt and cardiac index. Using a similar pattern of ventilation following mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, we found a significant decrease in cardiac index (but less than in the AVR group), a significant elevation of calculated physiologic deadspace (Vd/Vt) and no change in Qs/Qt. An hour after removal of PEEP, intravascular pressures, blood flow and blood-gas exchange values of all patients with AVR had returned to control levels; patients with MVR had persistently significantly low cardiac indices, while Vd/Vt returned to pre-PEEP values. These findings suggest that evaluation of responses to different ventilation patterns must take into account pre-existing V/Q abnormalities secondary to pulmonary vascular disease, particularly when these are secondary to chronic congestive heart failure. Following AVR, Qs/Qt changed in the same direction as cardiac index (CI) irrespective of ventilatory pattern: CI decreased and rose as CI increased. The authors conclude that with increasing severity of pulmonary vascular disease, changes in airway pressure will have an unpredictable effect on cardiac index unless the level of myocardial competence is taken into account. In the presence of ventricular failure, changes in pleural (and therefore transmural) pressures will be minimal compared with the high filling pressures and exert no influence on stroke volume. Although pulmonary venous hypertension was more pronounded in the MVR than in the AVR group, there was no significant difference between the postoperative values for Qs/Qt (Fio2 = 1.0), a condition probably fostered by marked differences in pre-existing V/Q.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.