Abstract
It can be shown theoretically that when the benefits of mutualism are shared among a group of neighbors, then the evolution of mutualism is impeded. This statement, however, is not as insightful as it might seem, because so little is known about the values of important parameters such as the costs and benefits of mutualism, or salient aspects of population structure. This study shows that a species of phoretic mite (Poecilochirus necrophori: Acari, Parasitidae) strongly enhances the breeding success of its beetle carrier, even though the benefits of this mutualism must be shared among a fairly large group. Thus, the group size argument should not be used to argue categorically against the prevalence of mutualism in nature.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
