The effect of personalized invalidation of symptoms by healthcare providers on patient depression: The mediating role of self-esteem

Abstract

ObjectivesQualitative research has thoroughly investigated the diagnostic journeys of patients, who have often reported difficulty with healthcare providers regarding the acknowledgement of an organic, pathological cause for their symptoms (hereafter referred to as invalidation of symptoms). These encounters also reportedly contributed to reductions in self-esteem and to feelings of depression, particularly prior to diagnosis. The aim of this research was to quantitatively validate these observed relationships and examine the potential compounding effect of personalization of this reported invalidation. MethodsParticipants were 609 patients with self-reported endometriosis from a larger online research study. Invalidation and personalization of invalidation were measured with survey items developed for this research. Self-esteem and depression were assessed with well-known validated and reliable self-report instruments. Hierarchical linear regressions were performed, with path analysis to test for mediation. ResultsInvalidation predicted self-esteem but not depression. However, when personalized, invalidation predicted both self-esteem and depression. Path analysis testing the effect of personalization of invalidation on depression through self-esteem was significant, demonstrating full mediation. ConclusionsResults confirm qualitative research and provide the first known quantitative support that invalidation, particularly when personalized, can be associated with reduced self-esteem and, in turn, greater depression. Practice implicationsThese findings demonstrate an important barrier to patient-centered communication.