Abstract

A question under debate in psycholinguistics is the nature of the relationship between spoken and written languages. Although it has been extensively shown that orthographic transparency, which varies across writing systems, strongly affects reading performance, its role in speech processing is much less investigated. The present study addressed this issue in Persian, whose writing system provides a possibility to assess the impact of orthographic transparency on spoken word recognition in young children at different stages of reading acquisition. In Persian, the long vowels are systematically present in the script, whereas the spelling correspondence of short vowels is progressively omitted from the script in the course of reading acquisition, thus, turning transparent into opaque spelling. Based on this unique characteristic, we tested 144 monolingual Persian-speaking nonreaders (i.e., preschoolers) and readers (second graders to fifth graders and young adults) in an auditory lexical decision task using transparent and opaque words. Overall, the results showed that, in accordance with the fact that the diacritics of short vowels are progressively omitted during the second year of schooling, the stimuli containing short vowels (opaque words) were recognized more slowly than transparent ones in third graders. Interestingly, there is a hint that the emergence of the transparency effect in the third graders was associated with an overall slower recognition speed in this group compared to their younger peers. These findings indicate that learning opaque spelling-sound correspondence might not only generate interference between the two language codes but also induce a general processing cost in the entire spoken language system.

Highlights

  • The present study proposed to fill this gap by examining the impact of orthographic transparency in spelling-to-sound direction on spoken word recognition within the same language where the same teaching method is applied to all children, and, we investigated how this impact evolved with children’s education level

  • Using an auditory lexical decision task in which performances on stimuli with transparent and opaque orthography were compared, we obtained evidence in line with our assumption: while no significant difference between stimuli with transparent and opaque orthography was found on preschoolers, stimuli with transparent orthography were recognized faster than those with opaque orthography in third graders, that is, the moment when the spelling markers of short vowels are completely removed from the script

  • These vowels were either fully presented or partially presented in the written script as diacritics for learning the new words, which made their spellings remain relatively transparent. This early phase of the transition from transparent to opaque spelling may explain the absence of the effect in second graders

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A number of behavioral studies conducted on adults have provided evidence that orthographic knowledge has significant impacts on speech processing (Seidenberg and Tanenhaus, 1979; Dijkstra et al, 1995; Ziegler and Ferrand, 1998; Ziegler et al, 2003, 2004; Ventura et al, 2004; Peereman et al, 2009; Rastle et al, 2011; Pattamadilok et al, 2013; Qu and Damian, 2016; Impact of Orthography on Speech RecognitionQu et al, 2018). Seidenberg and Tanenhaus (1979) reported that making rhyming decisions was easier when spoken words shared both rhyme and rhyme spelling (e.g., pie-tie) than when the same spoken rhyme had different spelling (e.g., rye-tie). Following this initial observation, several research groups have investigated the influence of orthographic knowledge in more elementary spoken word recognition tasks, such as lexical decision or semantic decision. Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals were found to be slower in making semantic judgments when semantically unrelated spoken words were orthographically related compared to when words were both semantically and orthographically unrelated (Qu et al, 2018)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call