Abstract
Introduction:The effect of obesity on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the effect of obesity on response to NACT and survival in locally-advanced gastric cancer (GC). Methods:From 2010 to 2019, 142 GC patients with clinical stage III disease who underwent curative surgery after NACT were enrolled. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to body mass index (BMI) as follows; BMI < 25 kg/m2, BMI = 25-30 kg/m2, and BMI > 30 kg/m2. The Mandard tumor regression grading system was used for tumor regression grade (TRG). Results:Of the 142 GC patients, 45(31.7%) were female. The median age was 58 years. BMI was < 25 kg/m2 in 60 (42.3%) patients, 25-30 kg/m2 in 44 (31%) patients, and > 30kg/m2 in 38 (26.8%) patients. The numbers of patients with TRGI-II, TRGIII, and TRGIV-V were 35 (24.6%), 44 (31%), and 63 (44.4%), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference among BMI groups in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.919 and p = 0.398, respectively). According to TRG groups; mDFS was 46 months in TRG I-II, 28 months in TRG III, and 18 months in TRG IV-V (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, presence of perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion were the factors affecting TRG. Conclusion:In our study, we found that pre-treatment obesity did not affect the TRG in clinical stage III GC patients. However, a better TRG status was associated with improved survival.
Highlights
The effect of obesity on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remains unknown
Patients with any of the following criteria were excluded from the study; age
We investigated the effect of obesity on response to NACT and long-term survival in clinical stage
Summary
The effect of obesity on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the effect of obesity on response to NACT and survival in locally-advanced gastric cancer (GC). Randomized trials and meta-analyses have indicated a significant survival benefit with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for locally-advanced GC patients, as compared with surgery alone (Cunningham et al, 2006; Xiong et al, 2014; Al-Batran et al, 2019). If metastatic spread occurs during or after NACT, in patients who have a greater risk of developing distant metastases, an unnecessary surgery will be prevented .The responses to frequently-used chemotherapy (CT) regimens range from 49% to 69.7% (Kobayashi and Kimura, 2000; Cunningham et al, 2006)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.