Abstract

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have improved infertility treatmentbut reproductive outcomes remain challenging. Nutrient supplementation is being explored to enhance pregnancy rates, increase live birth rates, and reduce miscarriage rates in females undergoing ART. Nutrients like folic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, and antioxidants have shown potential benefits, yet conflicting results exist. Live birth rates may also be influenced by nutrient supplementation, with coenzyme Q10 and vitamin D showing promise. Miscarriage rates may be reduced with nutrients such as vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acids, and antioxidants, although more research is needed for definitive conclusions. Scientific and medical literature databases such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science were queried to identify relevant English publications adhering to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Various reproductive metrics, encompassing biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, implantation rate, live birth rates, and miscarriage rates, were assessed as clinical endpoints.The study population included 996 female subjects receiving ART. Two studies performed investigations on subjects diagnosed with unexplained infertility, two studies specifically included polycystic ovary syndrome patients, and five studies did not provide any specific information on the type of infertility or subfertility. All studies reported on the clinical/ongoing pregnancy rate, among which four included studies observed a significantly higher rate. Out of the four studies that reported on implantation rates, three found significantly higher rates in treatment groups. Out of the three studies that reported on biochemical pregnancy rates, two studies found significantly higher rates in treatment groups. With respect to the clinical outcomes that were studied in this analysis, variable effects of nutritional supplementation on reproductive parameters were observed. Some studies reported significantly higher rates of clinical/ongoing pregnancy, implantation, biochemical pregnancy, and live birth, while no significant difference was found in miscarriage rates.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.