The Effect of Nursing Intervention Based on HFMEA Model on the Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis: A Randomized Controlled Study

Abstract

Radiationdermatitis is one of the most common complications in patients received radiotherapy. Previous studies shown that incidence of radiation induced dermatitis (RD) is 95%. HFMEA (Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) is a new model of nursing management. Many studies reported that HFMEA could reduce incidence of complications and adverse events, and significantly improve patient satisfaction. From March 2023 to October 2022, patients received radiotherapy in our center were recruited in this study. Participants were randomly divided into control group (N = 60) and observation group (N = 60) in a ratio of 1:1. Patients in the control group were given routine skin care, health education before radiotherapy and skin care manual during radiotherapy. Based on the standard care, a HFMEA-based nursing intervention was adopted in the observation group by the following methods: Set up HFMEA care team. HFMEA team is composed of head nurses, wound specialist nurses, psychotherapists, etc. The members of the group searched the literature, case analysis and brainstorming to find out the potential failure reasons in every process of nursing radiotherapy patients in the past. Implementation of targeted measures to improve the corresponding: all patients with radiation dermatitis baseline assessment, focus on high-risk patients to shift, regular guidance medication, responsible nurses check the management of patients' skin every day to strengthen the attention of medical staff and patients' family members to radiation dermatitis. The degree of skin injury, pain and psychological status were compared between the two groups at the end of radiotherapy. A total of 120 patients were enrolled in this study. Grade 1 RD was the most common in the observation group at the end of radiotherapy, and Grade 2 and 3 skin RD were less in the observation group than in the control group. There was not significant difference in the scores of SAS and SDS between the two groups before and after nursing (P > 0.05). In the observation group, the SAS scores (44.10±11.25 vs. 32.29 ± 7.72, P = 0.016) and SDS scores (40.98 ± 9.12 vs. 30.11 ± 5.23, P = 0.013) were significantly higher than the control group after nursing(P<0.05). The scores of SAS and SDS in the Observation Group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The scores of SAS in the Observation Group VS the control group were 32.29 ± 7.72 VS 39.09 ± 9.37 after nursing, SDS scores of Observation Group VS control group (30.11 ± 5.23 VS 38.76 ± 7.52, P<0.05). The visual analogue scale (Vas) score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (2.37 ± 0.45 VS 4.02 ± 0.53, P & Lt; 0.001), and the satisfaction degree of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (96.67% VS 80%, p = 0.004). HFMEA model could effectively reduce incidence of RD, eliminate negative emotion, relieve pain and improve nursing satisfaction.