Abstract

Methods Ninety one eligible subjects undergoing cardiac structural and functional assessment with LGE-CMR and Doppler echocardiography were investigated. Left ventricular function, volumes, myocardial thickness, left atrial volume, wall motion score index (WMSI) and the extent of LGE were assessed using CMR. Mitral early diastolic peak (Ewave) and late peak (A-wave) velocities, E/A ratio, deceleration time (DT) of mitral early velocity, early diastolic mitral annulus peak velocity was measured by echocardiography, and ratio of transmitral diastolic peak velocity to the mitral annular diastolic peak velocity (E/E’) was calculated. Classification of diastolic function as normal, mild dysfunction (impaired relaxation), moderate dysfunction (pseudonormal), and severe dysfunction (restrictive filling pattern) was performed according to standard criteria. The E/E ratio was used to estimate LV filling pressures. Results The majority (90%) of subjects with normal diastolic function exhibited no or minimal fibrosis (median LGE score, 0; interquartile range, 0 to 0). The prevalence of LGE positivity by diastolic filling pattern was 11.8% in impaired relaxation, 100% in pseudonormal, and 75% in restrictive filling (P<0.001). LGE score significantly and progressively increased with increasing severity of filling impairment, reaching 5 (interquartile range, 0.59.75) in patients with restrictive filling pattern (P<0.001). LGE was observed in 80% of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and 26.3% of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, but only in 3.6% of patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and none of patients with simple congenital heart disease (P<0.001). LGE score progressively increased with increasing left ventricular filling pressure estimated by tissue Doppler imaging-derived E/E (P<0.001, r=0.455). However it did not have any significant correlation with other echocardiographic diastolic function indices, such as E velocity, A velocity, and DT. Multiple linear regression showed LGE score (P=0.026, B =0.251) and WMSI (P<0.001, B=0.422) to be positively predictive for E/E value.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.