Abstract

PurposeThe present study aimed to measure the effect of a morphometric atlas selection strategy on the accuracy of multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation using the commercially available software package ADMIRE® and to determine the optimal number of selected atlases to use. Autosegmentation accuracy was measured by comparing all generated automatic BP segmentations with anatomically validated gold standard segmentations that were developed using cadavers.Materials and methodsTwelve cadaver computed tomography (CT) atlases were included in the study. One atlas was selected as a patient in ADMIRE®, and multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation was first performed with a group of morphometrically preselected atlases. In this group, the atlases were selected on the basis of similarity in the shoulder protraction position with the patient. The number of selected atlases used started at two and increased up to eight. Subsequently, a group of randomly chosen, non-selected atlases were taken. In this second group, every possible combination of 2 to 8 random atlases was used for multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation. For both groups, the average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard index (JI) and Inclusion index (INI) were calculated, measuring the similarity of the generated automatic BP segmentations and the gold standard segmentation. Similarity indices of both groups were compared using an independent sample t-test, and the optimal number of selected atlases was investigated using an equivalence trial.ResultsFor each number of atlases, average similarity indices of the morphometrically selected atlas group were significantly higher than the random group (p < 0,05). In this study, the highest similarity indices were achieved using multi-atlas autosegmentation with 6 selected atlases (average DSC = 0,598; average JI = 0,434; average INI = 0,733).ConclusionsMorphometric atlas selection on the basis of the protraction position of the patient significantly improves multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation accuracy. In this study, the optimal number of selected atlases used was six, but for definitive conclusions about the optimal number of atlases and to improve the autosegmentation accuracy for clinical use, more atlases need to be included.

Highlights

  • Recent technological and procedural advances in radiotherapy, such image guided radiotherapy and adaptive replanning, require numerous image acquisitions and a subsequent delineation of target structures and organs at risk (OAR)

  • The highest similarity indices were achieved using multi-atlas autosegmentation with 6 selected atlases

  • The present study aims to measure the effect of a morphometric atlas selection strategy implementation on the accuracy of multi-atlas-based brachial plexus (BP) autosegmentation and to determine the optimal number of selected atlases to use

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent technological and procedural advances in radiotherapy, such image guided radiotherapy and adaptive replanning, require numerous image acquisitions and a subsequent delineation of target structures and organs at risk (OAR). The need for automatic segmentation software certainly applies to OARs, which are especially difficult to segment due to their poor visibility on planning-CT. One of these invisible OARs in patients with lung, breast and headand-neck cancer is the brachial plexus (BP). Optimal deformable image registration and label fusion algorithms need to be chosen, the optimal number of atlases need to be determined, and the most patient-similar atlases need to be selected for registration. In earlier publications [3], the best label fusion algorithm and optimal number of atlases for automatic BP segmentation without atlas selection were already determined in ADMIRE® software. The effect of implementation of an atlas selection strategy on multiatlas-based BP autosegmentation accuracy has not yet been investigated

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call