Abstract

BackgroundHealth-related data at local level could be provided by supplementing national health surveys with local boosts. Self-completion surveys are less costly than interviews, enabling larger samples to be achieved for a given cost. However, even when the same questions are asked with the same wording, responses to survey questions may vary by mode of data collection. These measurement differences need to be investigated further.MethodsThe Health Survey for England in London ('Core') and a London Boost survey ('Boost') used identical sampling strategies but different modes of data collection. Some data were collected by face-to-face interview in the Core and by self-completion in the Boost; other data were collected by self-completion questionnaire in both, but the context differed. Results were compared by mode of data collection using two approaches. The first examined differences in results that remained after adjusting the samples for differences in response. The second compared results after using propensity score matching to reduce any differences in sample composition.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two samples for prevalence of some variables including long-term illness, limiting long-term illness, current rates of smoking, whether participants drank alcohol, and how often they usually drank. However, there were a number of differences, some quite large, between some key measures including: general health, GHQ12 score, portions of fruit and vegetables consumed, levels of physical activity, and, to a lesser extent, smoking consumption, the number of alcohol units reported consumed on the heaviest day of drinking in the last week and perceived social support (among women only).ConclusionSurvey mode and context can both affect the responses given. The effect is largest for complex question modules but was also seen for identical self-completion questions. Some data collected by interview and self-completion can be safely combined.

Highlights

  • Health-related data at local level could be provided by supplementing national health surveys with local boosts

  • The London Health Observatory (LHO) led a panLondon consortium to commission a local boost to the Health Survey for England (HSE) using the less costly method of self-completion questionnaires

  • This paper examines the extent to which the data from London participants in the HSE 2006, which primarily used face-to-face interviews, and the Boost Survey for London, which used self-completion questionnaires, are comparable, and the size and direction of any differences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health-related data at local level could be provided by supplementing national health surveys with local boosts. Even when the same questions are asked with the same wording, responses to survey questions may vary by mode of data collection. These measurement differences need to be investigated further. The Boost Survey for London used the same sampling strategy as the HSE but a different mode of data collection. This paper examines the extent to which the data from London participants in the HSE 2006, which primarily used face-to-face interviews, and the Boost Survey for London, which used self-completion questionnaires, are comparable, and the size and direction of any differences. The results for a number of health and health-related behaviours are compared

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call