The effect of missing postcanine teeth on chewing performance in man

Abstract

The masticatory performance of a group of subjects missing on average 5.7 postcanine teeth and of a control group with complete dentitions were compared. There were significant differences in performance between the two groups. Within the patient group the number of occluding units significantly influenced performance. The average number of chewing cycles needed to prepare the food for swallowing was significantly larger for the patient than for the control group. Despite this, subjects in the patient group swallowed, on average, significantly larger food particles. Correlations between chewing performance and the number of chews up to swallowing within each of the two groups did not reach significance. However, combining the data from the two groups and thus increasing the range of chewing performances yielded a highly significant correlation. Subjects with reduced performance needed more chewing cycles before swallowing the food. Significant correlations were also found between chewing performance and the size of the swallowed food; subjects with poor performance swallowed larger particles. The numbers of chewing cycles made to swallow a natural (peanut) and an artificial (Optosil) test food were highly correlated, indicating that both foods are suitable for testing chewing performance.