Abstract

The aim of this study is to get a better understanding for the effect of the set of the risks in the construction projects, in addition to how mitigating these risks in those projects. Indeed risks are frequently playing the same rules, but the nature of project defines the specific risks of the project. The first step in process of risks assessment is identification them. Once risk identification is complete, risk analysis is used to identify the likelihood the risks that have been identified will happen. Thus by using evidence from other research in the area, this study showed the impact of the set of the stages in the risk management process in the construction projects, which were discussed in greater detail in the theoretical aspect of the current study. The findings of the study were revealed the fact that the comprehension of risk and its management has the direct effect of understanding specific issues that involve to the project. In addition to that, the integration of a risk management process at each stage of its stages in construction projects must be oriented to the progress of the project and permeate all areas, functions and processes of the project. In this regard, the most successful project managers maintain open lines of communication throughout their organizations to stay in touch with constituent’s needs.

Highlights

  • Managing Risk is something that is more frequently associated with bridge building, mechanical engineering, or actuarial science in projects

  • Not surprisingly, when good project managers think about risk management process, they focus on mitigating risk within the project as a whole (Bannerman, 2008; Smith et al, 2009; Thamhain, 2013)

  • Considering the facts that risk management process has an impact on project‟s goals in the form of quality, time and cost, it should be an open and conscious process through all phases of the project

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Managing Risk is something that is more frequently associated with bridge building, mechanical engineering, or actuarial science in projects. Risk can be (Cervone, 2006): (1) reduced or eliminated by including problem remediation activities into the project plan; (2) transferred to other activities or other responsible parties; (3) absorbed or pooled by planning for them; (4) avoided by putting quality control practices and procedures into place. Among these techniques, some are implemented more and less costly than others. Not surprisingly, when good project managers think about risk management process, they focus on mitigating risk within the project as a whole (Bannerman, 2008; Smith et al, 2009; Thamhain, 2013)

Literature Review
The Managing Risk Process
Stage 1 Identifying Risks
External Risks
Stage 2 Analyzing Risks
Risk Team Analysis
Stage 3 Assessing Risks
Key Performance Indicators
Qualitative Assessment
Probable Maximum Loss
ABC Analysis
Risk Map
Stage 4 Controlling Risks
Stage 5 Monitoring Risks
Stage 6 Controlling Goals
Managing Risk in Progress of Project
Tasks of the Managing Risk Process
Risks in Personnel Sector
Bottleneck Risk Field
Departure Risk Field
Adaptation Risk Field
Motivation Risk Field
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.