The effect of low-abundance OTU filtering methods on the reliability and variability of microbial composition assessed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.

Abstract

PCR amplicon sequencing may lead to detection of spurious operational taxonomic units (OTUs), inflating estimates of gut microbial diversity. There is no consensus in the analytical approach as to what filtering methods should be applied to remove low-abundance OTUs; moreover, few studies have investigated the reliability of OTU detection within replicates. Here, we investigated the reliability of OTU detection (% agreement in detecting OTU in triplicates) and accuracy of their quantification (assessed by coefficient of variation (CV)) in human stool specimens. Stool samples were collected from 12 participants 22-55 years old. We applied several methods for filtering low-abundance OTUs and determined their impact on alpha-diversity and beta-diversity metrics. The reliability of OTU detection without any filtering was only 44.1% (SE=0.9) but increased after filtering low-abundance OTUs. After filtering OTUs with <0.1% abundance in the dataset, the reliability increased to 87.7% (SE=0.6) but at the expense of removing 6.97% reads from the dataset. When filtering was based on individual sample, the reliability increased to 73.1% after filtering OTUs with <10 copies while removing only 1.12% of reads. High abundance OTUs (>10 copies in sample) had lower CV, indicating better accuracy of quantification than low-abundance OTUs. Excluding very low-abundance OTUs had a significant impact on alpha-diversity metrics sensitive to the presence of rare species (observed OTUs, Chao1) but had little impact on relative abundance of major phyla and families and alpha-diversity metrics accounting for both richness and evenness (Shannon, Inverse Simpson). To increase the reliability of microbial composition, we advise removing OTUs with <10 copies in individual samples, particularly in studies where only one subsample per specimen is available for analysis.