The effect of lid hygiene on the tear film and ocular surface, and the prevalence of Demodex blepharitis in university students

Abstract

AimTo evaluate the effect blepharitis lid cleansers have on the tear film and ocular surface, and to examine the prevalence of Demodex folliculorum in a young population. MethodsForty-eight university students completed a randomised, controlled, investigator-masked, eight-week clinical trial. Three eyelid hygiene products were investigated: blepharitis eyelid cleanser (OCuSOFT® Lid Scrub® PLUS foam), diluted baby shampoo (10% Johnson’s® No More Tears ®) and a tea-tree based face wash (dr.organic®). Cooled boiled water was used as a control. Subjects attended for four visits: baseline, two weeks, four weeks and eight weeks. At each visit, subjective symptoms, non-invasive tear break up time, ocular surface staining and Demodex folliculorum investigation were assessed to evaluate any positive or negative effect on the tear film and ocular surface. Osmolarity was also measured at baseline and week eight only. ResultsThe overall prevalence of Demodex folliculorum found at baseline was 15%. Subjective symptoms improved in all groups, including control. There was no significant difference in mean osmolarity between the groups or within each group after eight weeks. There was a significant increase in osmolarity inter-eye variability in the baby shampoo group (5.5 ± 5.4 vs 15.2 ± 9.5; p = 0.03). There was no significant change in non-invasive tear break up time or ocular surface staining demonstrated after eight weeks of eyelid hygiene. ConclusionA low prevalence of Demodex folliculorum can be found in a young population. All blepharitis lid cleansers used demonstrated subjective improvement in symptoms, with no negative effects on tear break-up time or ocular surface staining. The blepharitis eyelid cleanser and tea-tree based face wash revealed no adverse effect on mean osmolarity or inter-eye variability. Similarly, baby shampoo did not cause a significant increase in mean osmolarity, however, a significant increase in inter-eye variability was found; suggesting a possible increase in ocular surface inflammation.