Abstract
This paper examines the effects of liability-sharing rules on social welfare and risk reduction when one firm (the principal) delegates indivisible hazardous activities to one of the potential firms (the agents). The problem is posed as providing incentives from the principal to the agents, through the contract, to reduce the level of accident probability under a liability rule in force. Our main findings are twofold: (1) when the agents are free from the potential of bankruptcy, strict liability of the principal achieves the highest level of social welfare, and (2) under the potential of the agent’s bankruptcy, a liability-sharing rule that achieves the highest level of social welfare depends on the agents’ asset levels and the costs of risk reduction. Regardless of the potential of bankruptcy, risk minimization results in social welfare maximization.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
