Abstract

In this study, two experiments were conducted to assess the role of word length in visual word recognition. In Experiment 1 two lists of Arabic three and five letter words were used in a print word-reading task which measured accuracy and reading time. In Experiment 2, three, four and five letter words were displayed in the center of fixation on a screen in a naming task measuring accuracy and naming time. In reading, two contrasting processes have been suggested: the holistic process and the analytical process. According to the holistic process, the recognition of a word is determined by its global features and configuration. Consequently, reading consists of the simultaneous processing of all the letters of a word in parallel. In contrast, according to the analytical process, reading is a sequential screening of all the letters within a particular word. Length effect—that is, short words are recognized more rapidly and accurately than long words—is the signature of analytical processing of the non-lexical route due to its seriality which is caused by assembled phonology. The results of both experiments revealed that the average reading time of Arabic words from paper and screen was affected by word length, reflecting certain analytical processes and the activation of a non-lexical route, in which letters are processed sequentially.

Highlights

  • There is disagreement between psychologists and education professionals regarding the process of word recognition in reading

  • We found a significant word length effect (F (1,104) = 83.677, p < 0.005), with an average reading time for three letter words (Mean=407, SD=103) being significantly shorter than that for five letter words (Mean=499, SD=151). (Figure 1)

  • The findings of Experiment 1 revealed that the average reading times for Arabic words were affected by word length, since the average reading time was shorter for three letter words than for five letter words reflecting analytical processes and the activation of the non-lexical route, which processes letters sequentially in letter strings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is disagreement between psychologists and education professionals regarding the process of word recognition in reading. According to the supporters of the holistic process, the global features and the configuration of a word determine its recognition (Cattell, 1886). Reading consists of the simultaneous processing of all word letters in parallel (LaBerge & Samuel, 1974). According to supporters of the analytical process, reading is a sequential screening of all the letters within a particular word (Bradshaw, Nettleton, & Taylor, 1981; Gough 1972; Whitney, 2001). If we think of the process of reading as a continuum, with analytical processing at one end and holistic processing at the other, the various extant word recognition models may be placed somewhere on this continuum (e.g., processing of supra-letter units) (Jordan, Patching, & Milner, 2000)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call