The effect of labour induction on the risk of caesarean delivery: using propensity scores to control confounding by indication.

Abstract

To use propensity score methods to control for confounding by indication in the association between labour induction and caesarean delivery. Cross-sectional analysis of administrative hospital discharge data supplemented by medical record information. Fourteen US member hospitals of the National Perinatal Information Center. A cohort of 166559 singleton liveborn deliveries in the period 2007-2012. We used propensity scores (PSs) to balance 83 covariates between induced and non-induced women, and compared estimates with traditional covariate adjustment. We estimated PSs for labour induction versus expectant management of pregnancy each week from 34 to 42weeks of gestation. We estimated risk ratios (RRs) for the association between labour induction and primary caesarean delivery from models with no adjustment, traditional adjustment of five covariates, matched PS, and adjustment for continuous PS. Caesarean delivery in current or subsequent week of gestation. In crude models labour induction increased the risk of caesarean delivery in all weeks (RR1.06-1.52), excepting 39weeks of gestation (RR0.89). After matching on PS, the analysis showed a significantly decreased risk of caesarean delivery with labour induction during weeks35-39 (RR0.77-0.92), and a significantly elevated risk at weeks40 (RR1.22) and 41 (RR1.39). Traditional covariate and PS adjustment resulted in RRs between those from crude and PS-matched models. There is evidence of considerable confounding by indication in the association of labour induction and caesarean delivery, particularly for preterm deliveries. Using PS methods, we found a reduced risk of caesarean delivery with labour induction before 40weeks of gestation, and an elevated risk for weeks40-42. With confounding adjustment, labour induction does not increase the risk of caesarean at 34-39weeks of gestation.