Abstract
Abstract In this article the authors examine the linguistic problems experienced by a class of second-language matric history candidates who are studying history through the medium of English in an upgrade programme. The written work of the students is analysed in some depth, alongside the language of the textbook; students' personal linguistic backgrounds and attitudes are also taken into account in order to discover whether levels of L2 competence correlate closely with levels of academic achievement in history. The study reveals that, despite their positive (instrumental) attitudes to English, the pupils' problems go well beyond grammar and discourse to aspects of cultural and historical knowledge and understanding and more general deficiencies in their broader educational experience. The language of the textbook is shown to be an additional barrier preventing access to factual information because of its unnecessary complexity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.