The Effect of Ketogenic Metabolic Therapy on Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: Case Series

A Phase I Study of the Combination of Sorafenib With Temozolomide and Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Primary and Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas

Treatment of recurrent high grade gliomas with hypofractionated stereotactic image-guided helical tomotherapy

An Australian experience with temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent high grade gliomas

Background: Clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) remain poor. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been implicated in metastasis, treatment resistance and recurrence of HHGs. We have shown in several clinical studies that anti-CSC-directed therapy provides benefits in many cancer types; however, this is the first report of a randomized clinical trial evaluating it for recurrent HGGs. Objective: Determine whether CSC-targeted cytotoxic agents selected by ChemoID assay-guided therapy improves survival in patients with recurrent HGG. Design, Settings, and Participants: In this parallel-group, randomized, phase-3 clinical trial, patients at 13 clinical sites in the USA with grade-III/IV recurrent glioma (2016 WHO guidelines) were randomized 1:1 to either ChemoID assay-guided therapy or physician-choice therapy, and then treated and followed until unacceptable toxic effects, hospice, or death. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Combined median follow-up was 9 months. Median OS (mOS) was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.7) in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs 9 months (95% CI, 4.2-13.8) in the physician-choice group (log-rank P = .010). Risk of death was significantly lower in the ChemoID assay group (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P = .008). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.1 vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 4.8-15.4 vs 1.9-5.1) (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Primary endpoint was met in this randomized clinical trial. The mOS was 3.5 months longer in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs the physician-choice group demonstrating the clinical advantage of treating HGG patients using CSC personalized therapy. Citation Format: Tulika Ranjan, Soma Sengupta, Alexander Yu, Candace M. Howard, Ricky Chen, Rekha Chaudhary, Nicholas Marko, Dawit Aregawi, Michael Glantz, Jon Glass, Richard M. Green, Christine Lu-Emerson, Aaron Mammoser, Hugh Moulding, Steven Jubelirer, Jason Schroeder, Mark Anderson, Frances Chow, Seth Lirette, Krista Denning, Anthony Alberico, Jagan Valluri, Pier Paolo Claudio. Multi-institutional randomized phase-3 trial comparing cancer stem cell-targeted vs physician-choice treatments in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (NCT03632135) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT224.

1526 Background: Despite noticeable progress in the treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGG), most patients experience tumor recurrence after standard treatment consisting of surgery, radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy. Imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of PDGFR-α, -β, c-kit, abl and arg, has been shown to produce tumor response in patients with recurrent gliomas (Raymond ProcASCO 2004, Dresemann ProcASCO 2004&2005, Reardon Proc ASCO 2005). We treated 34 patients with recurrent HGGs showing immunohistochemical expression of “imatinib targets” in the tumor tissue with imatinib. Methods: 34 patients, 16 women, 18 men, aged from 27 to 72 years, in median 49 years with recurrent HGG (GBM n= 23, AA n=11) were treated with imatinib 400 mg/day as continuous daily oral dosing. MRI was performed every three months or at clinical suspicion of progression. The median interval from diagnosis to the start of imatinib was 12.6 months (range 4.3 to 143 months). Imatinib was the 2nd line therapy in 15 patients, 3rd line in 13 and 4th line in 6 patients. ECOG performance score at start of imatinib was 1 in 9, 2 in 21 and 3 in 4 patients, respectively.Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tumor tissue with antibodies against PDGFR-α, and -β. Results: The median treatment period with imatinib was 4 months (3 weeks to 17 months). The best response achieved was major response in 2 patients, partial remission in 6, stable disease in 12 and progressive disease in 14 patients. Eleven patients were free from tumor progression after 6 months (PFS-6 32,4%). The two patients with major response improved clinically and showed no more evidence of increased metabolism as well in MRI spectroscopy as in C11-methionine PET for 13 and 17 months, respectively. One of them showed widespread PDGF-R-α expression in the tumor tissue. In all patients with objective response to imatinib, a clinical benefit was noted within the first month of treatment. Conclusions: Compared to the results of Raymond et al, we observed a higher percentage of patients with progression free survival at 6 months. Detailed analysis of imatinib targets in tumor tissue of patients treated with imatinib will be helpful to explore the potential of imatinib as treatment option for patients with HGG. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

BackgroundSOX2 is regarded as an important marker in stem cell. The change of SOX2 expression after adjuvant therapy in high grade glioma (HGG) remains unknown so far. Few patients with recurrent glioma have opportunity to undergo operation once again, so the recurrent glioma samples are scarce. This study tries to analyze SOX2 expression in paired primary and recurrent HGG, aims to better understand the transformation law of SOX2 after adjuvant therapy in HGG.MethodsTwenty-four recurrent HGG patients who undergone a second resection were included. 16 patients received adjuvant therapy, the remaining 8 patients didn’t receive any adjuvant therapy at all. The protein expression of SOX2 in paired primary and recurrent HGG was tested by immunohistochemistry. The statistical analysis was conducted by IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0.ResultsIn primary HGG, SOX2 expression of 3 + , 2 + , 1+ and 0+ were seen in 20 (83.3%), 1 (4.2%), 1 (4.2%) and 2 cases (8.3%), respectively. The expression of SOX2 was decreased in recurrent HGG compared to the paired primary sample (p = 0.001). The decrease of SOX2 was often seen in patients received chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both (p = 0.003). Patients with SOX2 high expression in primary glioma had a longer median PFS than those with SOX2 low expression with marginal statistic significance (12.7 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.083). For cases with SOX2 high expression in the primary glioma, those had SOX2 low expression after recurrence seemed to have worse prognosis as compared to patients with stable SOX2 high expression (PFS: 10.4 vs. 14.9 months, p = 0.036; OS: 27.0 vs 49.5 months, p = 0.005).ConclusionsThis is the first study comparing the protein expression of SOX2 in recurrent HGG and its paired primary tumor. SOX2 high expression is common in brain HGG, a tendency of decreased SOX2 expression in recurrent gliomas was evidenced. Lower SOX2 expression was seen in those patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Patients with low SOX2 expression in primary HGG usually have poorer prognosis, those with SOX2 expression decreased in recurrent HGG had worse outcome.

Recurrent pediatric high-grade glioma is a leading cause of cancer-related death in children. We report results of a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating survival outcome in pediatric patients with recurrent high-grade glioma over the last 20years. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Review databases were searched for relevant studies reporting on survival outcomes for pediatric patients with recurrent high-grade glioma treated between 1996 and 2016. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated cumulatively over all studies, by therapy subgroup, and by decade of treatment. Random effects models were used to control for heterogeneity as measured by the I2 statistic. A total of 17 studies across 4 treatment strategies were included. Eleven investigated traditional chemotherapy, 1 investigated targeted therapy, 3 investigated immunotherapy, and 2 investigated radiotherapy. A total of 129 patients were included with a median age of 10.0years. Cumulative PFS was 3.5months (95% CI 2.1-5.0). Cumulative OS was 5.6months (95% CI 3.9-7.3). OS was 4.0months (95% CI 1.9-6.1) using traditional chemotherapy, 9.3months using targeted therapies (95% CI 5.4-13), 6.9months using immunotherapy (95% CI 2.1-12), and 14months using reirradiation (95% CI 2.8-25). OS between 1996 and 2006 was 4.2months (95% CI 2.1-6.2) compared to 8.5months (95% CI 5.6-11) after 2006. Pediatric patients with recurrent high-grade glioma suffer from poor PFS and OS, regardless of therapy. There may be a trend towards improved OS in the last decade.

105 Background: To date, studies of single agent PD-1 or PDL-1 inhibitors in recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG) have shown infrequent responses ( < 10%) and limited efficacy. Reirradiation is considered one of the standard salvage regimens for selected patients with recurrent gliomas but tumor responses are also infrequent ( < 5%). Radiotherapy counteracts the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by increasing MHC class I expression and enhancing tumor neoantigen presentation and has a significant synergistic effect with PD-1 inhibition in preclinical models of glioma. Methods: From December 2014 to June 2016, 20 patients (14 men, 6 women) with recurrent HGG were treated with the combination of reirradiation and PD-1 inhibitors. 18 patients had a glioblastoma, 1 anaplastic astrocytoma and 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma. The median KPS at the start of this regimen was 70 (50 to 80). The median number of prior treatments for recurrent tumor was 2 (1-4), 100% had prior radaition, 95% prior temozolomide and 55% prior bevacizumab. 8 patients received pembrolizumab (2 mg/Kg every 3 weeks) and 12 patients received nivolumab (3 mg/Kg or 240 mg flat dose every 2 weeks). Median reirradiation dose was 35 Gy (12 Gy to 35 Gy). Results: There were 7 confirmed partial responses (35% objective response rate, ORR), 5 stable disease and 8 progressive disease. The median duration of response was 5 months (2.2 to 10+ months). Median PFS was 4 months and median OS was 10 months. Most common side effects were increased ALT (3 patients) and fatigue (2 patients). There was no obvious case of cerebral edema related to treatment. 5 patients required a mild increase of dexamethasone (2-4 mg) and all other 15 patients had decreased or stable dexamethasone dosage after the reirradiation. Conclusions: PD-1 inhibitors in combination with re-irradiation can be administered safely to patients with recurrent HGG. The ORR of 35% is an early signal of the potential synergist effect of the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with re-irradiation in HGG. This retrospective analysis of a heavily pre-treated population of recurrent HGG showed significantly higher ORR than either PD-1 inhibitors or re-irradiation alone. A clinical trial under development to test this hypothesis.

Background: To date, studies of single agent PD-1 or PDL-1 inhibitors in recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG) have shown infrequent responses (< 10%) and limited efficacy. Reirradiation is considered one of the standard salvage regimens for selected patients with recurrent gliomas but tumor responses are also infrequent (< 5%). Radiotherapy counteracts the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by increasing MHC class I expression and enhancing tumor neoantigen presentation and has a significant synergistic effect with PD-1 inhibition in preclinical models of glioma. Methods: From December 2014 to June 2016, 20 patients (14 men, 6 women) with recurrent HGG were treated with the combination of reirradiation and PD-1 inhibitors. 18 patients had a glioblastoma, 1 anaplastic astrocytoma and 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma. The median KPS at the start of this regimen was 70 (50 to 80). The median number of prior treatments for recurrent tumor was 2 (1–4), 100% had prior radaition, 95% prior temozolomide and 55% prior bevacizumab. 8 patients received pembrolizumab (2 mg/Kg every 3 weeks) and 12 patients received nivolumab (3 mg/Kg or 240 mg flat dose every 2 weeks). Median reirradiation dose was 35 Gy (12 Gy to 35 Gy). Results: There were 7 confirmed partial responses (35% objective response rate, ORR), 5 stable disease and 8 progressive disease. The median duration of response was 5 months (2.2 to 10+ months). Median PFS was 4 months and median OS was 10 months. Most common side effects were increased ALT (3 patients) and fatigue (2 patients). There was no obvious case of cerebral edema related to treatment. 5 patients required a mild increase of dexamethasone (2–4 mg) and all other 15 patients had decreased or stable dexamethasone dosage after the reirradiation. Conclusions: PD-1 inhibitors in combination with re-irradiation can be administered safely to patients with recurrent HGG. The ORR of 35% is an early signal of the potential synergist effect of the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with re-irradiation in HGG. This retrospective analysis of a heavily pre-treated population of recurrent HGG showed significantly higher ORR than either PD-1 inhibitors or re-irradiation alone. A clinical trial under development to test this hypothesis.

IDH mutations in low-grade gliomas (LGGs) results in improved survival and DNA hypermethylation compared to IDH wild-type LGGs. IDH-mutant LGGs become hypomethylated during progression. It's uncertain if methylation changes occur during IDH wild-type GBM progression and if the methylome can be reprogrammed. This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, efficacy and methylome changes after L-methylfolate (LMF) treatment, in combination with temozolomide and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Fourteen patients total, 13 with GBM, one with anaplastic astrocytoma, all IDH wild-type were enrolled in the study. All patients received LMF at either 15, 30, 60, or 90 mg daily plus temozolomide (75mg/m2 5 days per month) and bevacizumab (10mg/kg every two weeks). No MTD was identified. LMF treated had mOS of 9.5 months (95% CI, 9.1-35.4) comparable to bevacizumab historical control 8.6 months (95% CI, 6.8-10.8). Six patients treated with LMF survived more than 650 days. Across all treatment doses the most adverse events were diarrhea (7%, 1 patient, grade 2), reflux (7%, 1 patient, grade 2), and dysgeusia (7%, 1 patient, grade 2). In the six brains donated at death, there was a 25% increase in DNA methylated CpGs compared to the paired initial tumor. LMF in combination with temozolomide and bevacizumab was well tolerated in patients with recurrent IDH wild-type high-grade glioma. This small study did not establish a superior efficacy with addition of LMF compared to standard bevacizumab therapy, however, this study did show methylome reprogramming in high-grade glioma.

Continuous oral treatment with topotecan may be more effective than the typical 1-day and 5-day treatment schedules. In previous studies of continuous treatment with topotecan, increased intestinal side effects were reported in adult patients; however, the experience in pediatric patients and patients with high-grade glioma is quite limited. Thirty-two pediatric patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (16 females and 16 males; median age, 9.5 years) were enrolled in the current Phase I/II study. Tumor locations included the cerebral cortex (n = 5), pons (n = 18), and other sites (n = 9). An injectable formulation of topotecan was administered orally, in ice-cold orange juice, once daily. The starting dose of 0.4 mg/m(2) per day was escalated on a patient-by-patient basis. At each patient's maximum dose, blood samples were obtained for the determination of plasma hydroxytopotecan and topotecan lactone concentrations and for the calculation of pharmacokinetic quantities. The toxicity criteria for a maximum tolerated topotecan dose were met in only 19 patients. The primary toxicity type was hematologic. The median maximum tolerated dose was 0.9 mg/m(2) per day (n = 19). The calculated maximum total plasma topotecan concentration was 3.8 ng/mL (n = 7), with an area under the concentration-time curve of 38.4 ng. hours/mL and a half-life of 4.1 hours, which would result in the complete disappearance of topotecan from the plasma after 12 hours. Objective responses were observed in 2 of 13 evaluable patients and lasted for 2.5 and 9 months, respectively (continuous clinical remission, 1 of 14 patients; partial response, 2 of 14 patients; stable disease, 7 of 14 patients; progressive disease, 4 of 14 patients). Oral topotecan (median dose, 0.9 mg/m(2) per day) administered once daily was well tolerated and somewhat effective in children with recurrent high-grade glioma. A schedule in which the daily dose is split so that dosing is performed twice daily may be superior to the current schedule.

Patients with high grade glioma generally have poor prognoses. Addition of radiosensitizing agents might improve the response to irradiation. The chemotherapeutic agent estramustine sensitizes experimental gliomas to radiation. Gliomas express estramustine binding proteins, and cytotoxic concentrations of estramustine metabolites are found in gliomas after oral administration. Twenty three patients, aged 25-78, with new or recurrent high grade glioma were treated with estramustine and radiosurgery and/or radiotherapy. Patients with recurrent tumors were treated with estramustine and Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery; eligible tumors were limited to 4 cm maximal diameter. Patients with newly diagnosed tumors were treated with estramustine and fractionated radiotherapy, with radiosurgery also performed if the tumor was less than 4 cm maximal diameter. Estramustine (16 mg/kg per day orally) was started three days prior to radiosurgery, or, if only radiotherapy was performed, on the first day of radiotherapy. Estramustine was continued until the completion of radiosurgery and/or radiotherapy (72 Gy, 60 fractions, 1.2 Gy bid over 6 weeks). Of the 13 patients treated for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, median survival was 16 months with 38% 2-year survival. Of five patients treated for recurrent glioblastoma, survival was 3, 8, 9, 15, and 23 + months. Two patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma survived for 24 and 48+ months. One patient with recurrent anaplastic mixed glioma survived 5+ months. Two patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma survived 20 and 42+ months. Four of the new glioblastoma patients developed deep vein thrombosis. The results of this pilot study indicate some benefit, and further investigation incorporating estramustine into clinical trials is suggested.

The role of IDH inhibitors in recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG) is not well described. We present the outcomes of patients with HGG that were treated with these agents at our institution. We reviewed patients with recurrent IDH-mutant HGG treated with FDA approved IDH inhibitors (ivosidenib, enasidenib, and vorasidenib) from December 2019 to December 2024 at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. 23 patients were identified of which 65.2% were male. Tumors included astrocytoma (n = 14, 60.9%) and WHO grade 3 oligodendroglioma (n = 9, 39.1%), with four patients having a WHO grade 4 astrocytoma and 10 a WHO grade 3 astrocytoma. Twenty patients had enhancing disease at the time an IDH inhibitor was recommended. One patient was treated with enasidenib, 17 with ivosidenib, and 5 with vorasidenib. Of those initially treated with ivosidenib, 9 were switched to vorasidenib. Two patients discontinued the drugs due to side effects, that included elevated liver enzymes (n = 1), and diarrhea (n = 1). All patients had received prior surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy before starting an IDH inhibitor. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. OS after IDH inhibitor was 20.7 months and was longer in patients that had not received initial chemotherapy (p = 0.032). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.8 months and was not different between tumor type, sex, or number of recurrences, but was longer in patients that did not receive initial chemotherapy (p = 0.041). IDH inhibitors were well tolerated in patients with IDH-mutant HGG previously treated with DNA-damaging agents. A median PFS longer than 6 months is encouraging in this patient population and may be due to antitumor activity of IDH inhibitors in recurrent HGG.

2028 Background: Clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) remain poor. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been implicated in metastasis, treatment resistance and recurrence of HHGs. We have shown in several clinical studies that anti-CSC-directed therapy selected by ChemoID assay provides benefits in many cancer types; however, this is the first report of a randomized clinical trial evaluating whether CSC-targeted cytotoxic agents selected by ChemoID assay-guided therapy improves survival in patients with recurrent HGG. Methods: In this parallel-group, randomized, phase-3 clinical trial, patients at 13 clinical sites in the USA with grade-III/IV recurrent glioma (2016 WHO guidelines) were randomized 1:1 to either ChemoID assay-guided therapy or physician-choice therapy, and then treated and followed until unacceptable toxic effects, hospice, or death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Combined median follow-up was 9 months. Median OS (mOS) was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.7) in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs 9 months (95% CI, 4.2-13.8) in the physician-choice group (log-rank P =.010). Risk of death was significantly lower in the ChemoID assay group (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P =.008). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.1 vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 4.8-15.4 vs 1.9-5.1) (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44; P &lt;.001). Conclusions: Primary endpoint was met in this randomized clinical trial. The mOS was 3.5 months longer in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs the physician-choice group. Clinical trial information: NCT03632135.

High-grade gliomas (HGGs), the most common and aggressive primary brain tumors in adults, inevitably recur due to incomplete surgery or resistance to therapy. Intratumoral genomic and cellular heterogeneity of HGGs contributes to therapeutic resistance, recurrence, and poor clinical outcomes. Transcriptomic profiles of HGGs at recurrence have not been investigated in detail. Using targeted sequencing of cancer-related genes and transcriptomics, we identified single nucleotide variations, small insertions and deletions, copy number aberrations (CNAs), as well as gene expression changes and pathway deregulation in 16 pairs of primary and recurrent HGGs. Most of the somatic mutations identified in primary HGGs were not detected after relapse, suggesting a subclone substitution during the tumor progression. We found a novel frameshift insertion in the ZNF384 gene which may contribute to extracellular matrix remodeling. An inverse correlation of focal CNAs in EGFR and PTEN genes was detected. Transcriptomic analysis revealed downregulation of genes involved in messenger RNA splicing, cell cycle, and DNA repair, while genes related to interferon signaling and phosphatidylinositol (PI) metabolism are upregulated in secondary HGGs when compared to primary HGGs. In silico analysis of the tumor microenvironment identified M2 macrophages and immature dendritic cells as enriched in recurrent HGGs, suggesting a prominent immunosuppressive signature. Accumulation of those cells in recurrent HGGs was validated by immunostaining. Our findings point to a substantial transcriptomic deregulation and a pronounced infiltration of immature dendritic cells in recurrent HGG, which may impact the effectiveness of frontline immunotherapies in the GBM management. KEY MESSAGES: Most of the somatic mutations identified in primary HGGs were not detected after relapse. Focal CNAs in EGFR and PTEN genes are inversely correlated in primary and recurrent HGGs. Transcriptomic changes and distinct immune-related signatures characterize HGG recurrence. Recurrent HGGs are characterized by a prominent infiltration of immature dendritic and M2 macrophages.