Abstract

Little is known about how important social behaviors such as song vary within and among populations for any of the endemic Hawaiian honeycreepers. Habitat loss and non‐native diseases (e.g., avian malaria) have resulted in isolation and fragmentation of Hawaiian honeycreepers within primarily high elevation forests. In this study, we examined how isolation of Hawai'i ‘amakihi (Chlorodrepanis virens) populations within a fragmented landscape influences acoustic variability in song. In the last decade, small, isolated populations of disease tolerant ‘amakihi have been found within low elevation forests, allowing us to record ‘amakihi songs across a large elevational gradient (10–1800 m) that parallels disease susceptibility on Hawai'i island. To understand underlying differences among populations, we examined the role of geographic distance, elevation, and habitat structure on acoustic characteristics of ‘amakihi songs. We found that the acoustic characteristics of ‘amakihi songs and song‐type repertoires varied most strongly across an elevational gradient. Differences in ‘amakihi song types were primarily driven by less complex songs (e.g., fewer frequency changes, shorter songs) of individuals recorded at low elevation sites compared to mid and high elevation populations. The reduced complexity of ‘amakihi songs at low elevation sites is most likely shaped by the effects of habitat fragmentation and a disease‐driven population bottleneck associated with avian malaria, and maintained through isolation, localized song learning and sharing, and cultural drift. These results highlight how a non‐native disease through its influence on population demographics may have also indirectly played a role in shaping the acoustic characteristics of a species.

Highlights

  • In oscine Passerines, song is a culturally transmitted trait that is acquired through social learning and imitation (Lynch, 1996)

  • We addressed the following questions: (1) What is the degree of divergence among populations in both song-­type repertoires and acoustic characteristics of song? (2) What is the relationship between divergent song types among populations and the underlying physical acoustic characteristics of ‘amakihi song? (3) Which ecological features across the landscape are most strongly associated with differences in acoustic characteristics among ‘amakihi populations: (a) geographic distance between populations, (b) elevation of populations as a proxy for changes in disease susceptibility, or (c) habitat structure?

  • We found significant differences in both population song-t­ype repertoires and physical acoustic characteristics of ‘amakihi songs most strongly associated with the isolation of populations across an elevational gradient of disease susceptibility, and not the geographic distance among populations

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

In oscine Passerines (e.g., songbirds), song is a culturally transmitted trait that is acquired through social learning and imitation (Lynch, 1996). The acoustic adaptation hypothesis (Morton, 1975; Wiley & Richards, 1978) predicts that the natural attenuation and degradation of acoustic signals as they are transmitted through vegetation should lead to the selection of acoustic structures (e.g., pitch, frequency) that minimize interference and maximize transmission fidelity (Boncoraglio & Saino, 2007; Kirsche et al, 2011). (3) Which ecological features across the landscape are most strongly associated with differences in acoustic characteristics among ‘amakihi populations: (a) geographic distance between populations, (b) elevation of populations as a proxy for changes in disease susceptibility, or (c) habitat structure? We addressed the following questions: (1) What is the degree of divergence among populations in both song-­type repertoires and acoustic characteristics of song? (2) What is the relationship between divergent song types among populations and the underlying physical acoustic characteristics of ‘amakihi song? (3) Which ecological features across the landscape are most strongly associated with differences in acoustic characteristics among ‘amakihi populations: (a) geographic distance between populations, (b) elevation of populations as a proxy for changes in disease susceptibility, or (c) habitat structure?

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call