Abstract
AbstractThis experiment aims to study the effect of water‐saving irrigation on rice production and methane emissions. Three irrigation methods, that is, flooding irrigation, deficit irrigation (DI) and alternate partial root‐zone drying (APRD), were employed in a 2‐year field trial. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications. For the DI and APRD treatments, plots were not irrigated until the soil matric potential reached −10 (DI10 and APRD10), −30 (DI30 and APRD30) and −60 kPa (DI60 and APRD60). In the APRD treatments, two adjacent furrows of each plant row were alternately irrigated in consecutive irrigation events. The DI and APRD treatments did not affect yield components when the soil matric potential was −10 kPa. Applying APRD treatments increased irrigation water productivity by 45%, 51% and 31% for soil matric potentials of −10, −30 and −60 kPa, respectively. On average, water stress treatments reduced methane emissions by 78% compared to flooding treatment. On average, the APRD treatments decreased the water input by 10% compared with the DI treatments while achieving a 2.5% higher yield. This is the first study to outline the effect of APRD on methane emissions and rice production. These findings suggest that APRD could be a valuable strategy to mitigate methane emissions without risking rice yield reduction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.