Abstract

BackgroundAnaemia following hip fracture is common. Approximately 30 to 45% of patients have haemoglobin concentrations below population norms on admission, and around 10% are severely anaemic. Anaemia on admission, and in the postoperative period, is associated with poor outcomes with regard to mobility, postoperative mortality and readmission. There is currently no clear consensus on the optimal method of managing perioperative anaemia in this group of frail patients with frequent comorbidity. Liberal red cell transfusion in the postoperative period does not appear to improve outcome, whereas tranexamic acid appears to reduce transfusion rate at the expense of increased cardiovascular morbidity. There are encouraging results from one centre with the use of agents to stimulate red cell production, including intravenous iron and erythropoietin. UK practice differs significantly from these patients and these studies, and it is not clear whether these promising results will translate to the UK population.Methods/DesignThis is a single-centre randomized controlled parallel group trial, in a British university hospital.Randomization is achieved using a website and computer-generated concealed tables. Participants are 80 patients 70 years or over with acute hip fracture undergoing operative repair. The intervention group receive three daily infusions of 200 mg iron sucrose, starting within 24 hours of admission. The control group receive standard hospital care at the discretion of the clinical team. Red cell transfusions for each group are given in accordance with standard clinical triggers. The primary outcome is an increase in mean reticulocyte count in the intervention group at day 7. Secondary outcome measures include haemoglobin concentrations, early and late transfusion rates, infectious and cardiovascular complications, mobility and 30-day mortality.DiscussionThis is a pilot study to demonstrate haematopoietic efficacy of intravenous iron in this setting. Hence, we have chosen to measure change in reticulocyte count rather than the more clinically relevant differences in haemoglobin concentration or transfusion rate. If our results are positive, the study will provide the necessary information for development of a full-scale trial of intravenous iron.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN76424792; UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (EuDRACT: 2011-003233-34).

Highlights

  • If our results are positive, the study will provide the necessary information for development of a full-scale trial of intravenous iron

  • Study objectives Primary aims To investigate whether intravenous iron given as three 200 mg doses over three days in patients with hip fracture causes an increase in reticulocyte count in the early postoperative period; Secondary aims To discover whether intravenous iron has beneficial effects on other measures of haematopoiesis, transfusion requirements and patient outcomes

  • Participants will be excluded if they are currently taking clopidogrel or ticlopidine; aspirin is not an exclusion medication. (UK doses (75 mg or 150 mg) are not associated with increased surgical bleeding)

Read more

Summary

Discussion

Anaemia following hip fracture is common and associated with poorer outcomes for this group of frail patients. It is unlikely that intravenous iron, as a single intervention, will alter major outcomes, such as length of stay, mortality or readmission rates to a clinically significant degree, but it is plausible for it to have a beneficial effect on transfusion rates. This is only likely to happen if a significant effect on erythropoiesis occurs; our choice of the absolute difference in reticulocyte count as the primary outcome of this study. A fullscale trial would help to define the potential cost, resource requirement (blood products) or direct patient benefit of using intravenous iron as part of such a bundle of care. Author details 1Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. 2Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. 3Department of Healthcare of Older People, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

Background
Methods/Design
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call