Abstract

Abstract. Uncertainty in hydrological modeling is of significant concern due to its effects on prediction and subsequent application in watershed management. Similar to other distributed hydrological models, model uncertainty is an issue in applying the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Previous research has shown how SWAT predictions are affected by uncertainty in parameter estimation and input data resolution. Nevertheless, little information is available on how parameter uncertainty and output uncertainty are affected by input data of varying complexity. In this study, SWAT-Hillslope (SWAT-HS), a modified version of SWAT capable of predicting saturation-excess runoff, was applied to assess the effects of input data with varying degrees of complexity on parameter uncertainty and output uncertainty. Four digital elevation model (DEM) resolutions (1, 3, 10 and 30 m) were tested for their ability to predict streamflow and saturated areas. In a second analysis, three soil maps and three land use maps were used to build nine SWAT-HS setups from simple to complex (fewer to more soil types/land use classes), which were then compared to study the effect of input data complexity on model prediction/output uncertainty. The case study was the Town Brook watershed in the upper reaches of the West Branch Delaware River in the Catskill region, New York, USA. Results show that DEM resolution did not impact parameter uncertainty or affect the simulation of streamflow at the watershed outlet but significantly affected the spatial pattern of saturated areas, with 10m being the most appropriate grid size to use for our application. The comparison of nine model setups revealed that input data complexity did not affect parameter uncertainty. Model setups using intermediate soil/land use specifications were slightly better than the ones using simple information, while the most complex setup did not show any improvement from the intermediate ones. We conclude that improving input resolution and complexity may not necessarily improve model performance or reduce parameter and output uncertainty, but using multiple temporal and spatial observations can aid in finding the appropriate parameter sets and in reducing prediction/output uncertainty.

Highlights

  • Uncertainty in hydrological modeling is of significant concern due to its effects on prediction and subsequent decisionmaking (Van Griensven et al, 2008; Sudheer et al, 2011)

  • This paper is a follow-up to our previous study using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)-HS model, investigating the effect of input data complexity on the uncertainty in predictions of streamflow and saturated areas

  • We chose DEM10m resampled from lidar DEM1m as the most appropriate resolution because DEM10m gives a better physical representation of the landscape and is a compromise between the high-resolution DEM1m and DEM3m that provide too much spatial detail, which affects the calculation of upslope contributing areas and topographic index (TI), and coarse-resolution DEM30m that averages out the essential details

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Uncertainty in hydrological modeling is of significant concern due to its effects on prediction and subsequent decisionmaking (Van Griensven et al, 2008; Sudheer et al, 2011). The uncertainty of a model can be associated with different components: (i) model structure, (ii) input data and (iii) model parameters (Lindenschmidt et al, 2007). L. Hoang et al.: Effect of input data on output uncertainty parameter interdependence, leading to the possibility that changes in some parameters may be compensated for by changes in others, so that different parameter sets may produce the same simulated results (Bárdossy and Singh, 2008). Hoang et al.: Effect of input data on output uncertainty parameter interdependence, leading to the possibility that changes in some parameters may be compensated for by changes in others, so that different parameter sets may produce the same simulated results (Bárdossy and Singh, 2008) This so-called equifinality is very common in hydrological models and is one of the main causes for uncertainties in model predictions (Beven and Freer, 2001)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.