Abstract

The instrumental variables (IV) model is widely used in estimating returns to education. A key, untestable, assumption for the validity of IV is the exclusion restriction. In this paper, I revisit the common schooling instrument based on local college openings to evaluate its validity and estimate heterogeneity in treatment effects. To do this, I use infant radiation exposure in the U.S. in the early 1960s as a measurable shifter that affects the latent ability term, which is assumed to be independent of the IV. Under the IV assumptions, introducing a control function for latent ability should have no effect on the estimated return to schooling. I find that controlling for infancy radiation exposure does not significantly alter the IV estimates. Second, the latent ability shifter can be used to identify heterogeneity in IV treatment effects. I show that the estimated IV treatment effect of schooling on wages decreases sharply with infancy radiation exposure.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call