Abstract

In the triple-to-double coincidence ratio (TDCR) method of liquid scintillation counting, unaccounted or improperly accounted impurities can result in lower-than-expected or higher-than-expected recovered activities, depending on the counting efficiency of the nuclide of interest, the counting efficiency of the radionuclidic impurity, and the amount of impurity present. We describe these general dependences using a simple model. The trends predicted by the model are tested experimentally using a series of mixed 241Am/3H and 63Ni/3H sources. An “impurity surface” is derived to facilitate an intuitive grasp of impurity phenomena in TDCR.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call