Abstract
In this study, a comparison of the properties of homocysteine and homocystine adsorption at mercury/chlorate(VII) interface was done. The adsorption of homocysteine and homocystine is in fact the adsorption of mercury(II) cysteine thiolate and mercury(I) cysteine thiolate. The differences in the capacity curves result probably from the formation of mercurous thiolate at the mercury surface. It seems that the changes in Ez and γz values accompanying the change in the amino acid protonation in the basic electrolyte solution, confirm the altered arrangement of the cysteine mercury thiolates on the electrode surface.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have