Abstract

BackgroundObtaining vascular access can be challenging during resuscitation following cardiac arrest, and it is particularly difficult and time-consuming in paediatric patients. We aimed to compare the efficacy of high-dose intramuscular (IM) versus intravascular (IV) epinephrine administration with regard to the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in an asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest rat model.Methods Forty-five male Sprague-Dawley rats were used for these experiments. Cardiac arrest was induced by asphyxia, and defined as a decline in mean arterial pressure (MAP) to 20 mmHg. After asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest, the rats were randomly allocated into one of 3 groups (control saline group, IV epinephrine group, and IM epinephrine group). After 540 s of cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed, and IV saline (0.01 cc/kg), IV (0.01 mg/kg, 1:100,000) epinephrine or IM (0.05 mg/kg, 1:100,000) epinephrine was administered. ROSC was defined as the achievement of an MAP above 40 mmHg for more than 1 minute. Rates of ROSC, haemodynamics, and arterial blood gas analysis were serially observed.ResultsThe ROSC rate (61.5%) of the IM epinephrine group was less than that in the IV epinephrine group (100%) but was higher than that of the control saline group (15.4%) (log-rank test). There were no differences in MAP between the two groups, but HR in the IM epinephrine group (beta coefficient = 1.02) decreased to a lesser extent than that in the IV epinephrine group with time.ConclusionsIM epinephrine induced better ROSC rates compared to the control saline group in asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest, but not compared to IV epinephrine. The IM route of epinephrine administration may be a promising option in an asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest.

Highlights

  • Obtaining vascular access can be challenging during resuscitation following cardiac arrest, and it is difficult and time-consuming in paediatric patients

  • In the case of anaphylaxis, even if the Blood pressure (BP) is very low at the beginning, IM injection of epinephrine is recommended as the first intervention

  • The IM epinephrine group (n = 13) had a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate of 61.5% (8/13), and all rats with ROSC survived until the 1-h endpoint

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Obtaining vascular access can be challenging during resuscitation following cardiac arrest, and it is difficult and time-consuming in paediatric patients. We aimed to compare the efficacy of high-dose intramuscular (IM) versus intravascular (IV) epinephrine administration with regard to the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in an asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest rat model. The time from the occurrence of cardiovascular collapse to the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is an important post-arrest prognostic indicator [1,2,3]. The most adequate dose, route of administration and time of effective epinephrine administration during cardiac arrest have been investigated. Vascular access can be challenging during resuscitation following cardiac arrest, and it can be difficult and time-consuming in paediatric patients. Endotracheal epinephrine administration can be performed only after successful advanced airway management

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call