Abstract

BackgroundIt has been suggested that pacing is a thermoregulatory behaviour. We investigated the effect of competition on pacing, performance and thermophysiological strain during exercise in the heat and the psychological factors mediating competition effects.MethodEighteen males (maximum oxygen uptake [VO2max] 3.69 [0.44] L min−1) undertook a preliminary 20-km cool (wet-bulb globe temperature [WBGT] 12 °C) cycling time trial (TT) and three experimental 20-km trials (balanced order): (i) cool TT (CoolSolo); (ii) hot (WBGT 26 °C) TT (HotSolo); (iii) hot head-to-head competition (HotH2H). During TTs, an avatar of the participant’s performance was visible. During HotH2H, participants believed they were competing against another participant, but the competitor’s avatar replicated their own preliminary (cool) TT.ResultsTTs (min:sec [SD]) slowed with increased ambient temperature [CoolSolo 35:31 (2:11) versus HotSolo 36:10 (2:26); p = 0.011]. This effect was negated by competition; performances were not different between HotH2H [35:17 (1:52)] and CoolSolo (p = 0.160) and were quicker in HotH2H versus HotSolo (p = 0.001). End-exercise rectal temperature, mean body temperature and physiological strain index were (p < 0.05) higher in HotH2H than either solo condition. Despite faster performance and greater thermophysiological strain, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), thermal comfort and sensation, and perceptual strain index were not different between HotH2H and HotSolo. The difference in end-exercise rectal temperature between HotH2H and HotSolo was related to pre-exercise anticipatory heart rate response (r = 0.608, p = 0.010) and participants’ propensity for deliberate risk-taking (B = 0.12, p < 0.001), whereas self-reported resilience predicted change in performance times between HotH2H versus HotSolo (B = − 9.40, p = 0.010).ConclusionCompetition changes the relationship between perceived and actual thermophysiological state, altering behavioural thermoregulation and increasing thermophysiological strain; this could increase heat-illness risk. Psychophysiological and psychological measures may identify susceptible individuals.

Highlights

  • Prolonged exercise (C 30 min) is impaired in hot environments compared with cooler conditions [1], the effect of ambient temperature on prolonged exercise performance is not dichotomous, but is instead a continuum, with the fastest performances often achieved at a temperature of * 10 °C and an exponential slowing occurring as temperature increases beyond this optimum [2, 3]

  • Overall completion times were slower in the heat compared with when the run was undertaken in cool conditions [5]; during self-paced exercise in a hot environment, performance may be impaired with modest hyperthermia [6] and work rate is often reduced before a ‘critical’ thermal comfort (TC) [7]

  • Completion time differed between trials (F(2,34) = 9.69, p\0.001, partial g2 = 0.36); solo time trial (TT) performance slowed with increased temperature (CoolSolo vs HotSolo, p = 0.011), but this was negated by competition (CoolSolo vs HotH2H; p = 0.160) and performances were quicker in HotH2H versus HotSolo (p = 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prolonged exercise (C 30 min) is impaired in hot environments (air temperature C 30 °C) compared with cooler conditions (air temperature B 20 °C) [1], the effect of ambient temperature on prolonged exercise performance is not dichotomous, but is instead a continuum, with the fastest performances often achieved at a temperature of * 10 °C and an exponential slowing occurring as temperature increases beyond this optimum [2, 3]. Overall completion times were slower in the heat compared with when the run was undertaken in cool conditions [5]; during self-paced exercise in a hot environment, performance may be impaired with modest hyperthermia [6] and work rate is often reduced before a ‘critical’ TC [7]. The mechanisms underpinning this effect are complex, resulting from an interplay of cardiovascular, peripheral (muscular), central nervous [8] and psychological factors [9].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call