Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of group investigation (GI) learning model with brainstorming technique on student physics learning outcomes (PLO) compared to jigsaw learning model with brainstroming technique. The learning outcome in this research are the results of learning in the cognitive domain. The method used in this research is experiment with Randomised Postest Only Control Group Design. Population in this research is all students of class XI IPA SMA Negeri 9 Kupang year lesson 2015/2016. The selected sample are 40 students of class XI IPA 1 as the experimental class and 38 students of class XI IPA 2 as the control class using simple random sampling technique. The instrument used is 13 items description test. The first hypothesis was tested by using two tailed t-test. From that, it is obtained that H0 rejected which means there are differences of students physics learning outcome. The second hypothesis was tested using one tailed t-test. It is obtained that H0 rejected which means the students PLO in experiment class were higher than control class. Based on the results of this study, researchers recommend the use of GI learning models with brainstorming techniques to improve PLO, especially in the cognitive domain.

Highlights

  • Progress of a nation is determined by the quality of the education system

  • This condition causes national education not to produce people who are independent, creative and have self awareness [7], 2) In Education Development Index (EDI) 2011 Indonesia is ranked 69th of 127 countries, 3) According to the Education For All Global Monitoring Report 2012 released by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Indonesia's education is ranked 64th for education worldwide from 120 countries, 4) Based on data from the 2012 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012, Indonesia ranks 64th out of 65 countries

  • Image1.1 Average value of student learning outcomes. Based on these data it can be seen that the students learning outcomes in the cognitive domain differ between the experimental class and the control class

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Progress of a nation is determined by the quality of the education system. Aware of this, every nation is competing with various efforts to improve the quality of education in their respective countries. These strategic educational issues are reinforced by various research results, like: 1) Research by Suyanto and Hisham in 2000 stated that in the micro scale the learning process in almost all levels of education focuses only on the left brain, while the right brain is rarely developed This condition causes national education not to produce people who are independent, creative and have self awareness [7], 2) In Education Development Index (EDI) 2011 Indonesia is ranked 69th of 127 countries, 3) According to the Education For All Global Monitoring Report 2012 released by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Indonesia's education is ranked 64th for education worldwide from 120 countries, 4) Based on data from the 2012 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012, Indonesia ranks 64th out of 65 countries. METHODE This research is experiment in SMA N 9 Kupang with Randomised Postest Only

Sample Treatment Post test
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call