Abstract

The genitalia of most male arthropods scale hypoallometrically with body size, that is they are more or less the same size across large and small individuals in a population. Such scaling is expected to arise when genital traits show less variation than somatic traits in response to factors that generate size variation among individuals in a population. Nevertheless, there have been few studies directly examining the relative sensitivity of genital and somatic traits to factors that affect their size. Such studies are key to understanding genital evolution and the evolution of morphological scaling relationships more generally. Previous studies indicate that the size of genital traits in male Drosophila melanogaster show a relatively low response to variation in environmental factors that affect trait size. Here we show that the size of genital traits in male fruit flies also exhibit a relatively low response to variation in genetic factors that affect trait size. Importantly, however, this low response is only to genetic factors that affect body and organ size systemically, not those that affect organ size autonomously. Further, we show that the genital traits do not show low levels of developmental instability, which is the response to stochastic developmental errors that also influence organ size autonomously. We discuss these results in the context of current hypotheses on the proximate and ultimate mechanisms that generate genital hypoallometry.

Highlights

  • Within a population or species, variation in body size is expected to be accompanied by approximately equivalent variation in the size of individual morphological traits

  • Consistent with our understanding of the mechanisms that generate morphological scaling relationships, we find that genital traits are genetically canalized

  • None of the traits differed in their level of organ-autonomous genetic variation (CVI) – that is the amount of genetic variation in trait size that is not correlated with variation in the size of other traits – when correcting for multiple comparisons (Tukey’s HSD, p.0.05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Within a population or species, variation in body size is expected to be accompanied by approximately equivalent variation in the size of individual morphological traits. Such covariation is necessary to maintain correct body proportion across the range of body sizes observed in animal populations. A notable exception to this pattern, is the relationship between genital size and body size in arthropods. The genitalia of most arthropods are more-or-less the same size in both large and small individuals [1,2,3,4,5]. Smaller males have proportionally larger genitalia than larger males. While the phenomenon is most obvious in males, it has been observed in female arthropods [5,6,7,8], as well as some mammals [9,10,11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call