Abstract

It is unclear whether there is a difference in the effect of gefitinib treatment between patients with postoperative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and those with stage IV NSCLC harboring mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients with postoperative recurrent NSCLC (postoperative group) or stage IV NSCLC (stage IV group) harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with gefitinib at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between September 2002 and March 2012 to compare the effect of gefitinib on survival from treatment initiation. A total of 168 patients were treated with gefitinib (postoperative group, 49 patients; stage IV group, 119 patients). The response rate of gefitinib treatment in the postoperative group was similar to that in the stage IV group (58 vs. 61 %, p = 0.613). In contrast, median progression-free survival (PFS; 15.8 vs. 9.8 months, p < 0.001) and median overall survival (OS; 51.1 vs. 22.2 months, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the postoperative group. In addition, postoperative recurrent disease, performance status (0-1), and a single metastatic organ were independent favorable prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis of survival. PFS and OS were superior in patients with postoperative recurrent NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations treated by gefitinib than in those with stage IV disease. These results suggest that postoperative recurrent disease may be considered a stratification factor in clinical trials for NSCLC with EGFR mutations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.