Abstract
This paper studies a single-vendor–multi-retailer supply chain and considers the case where the vendor merges with one of its retailers. After the merger, the vendor supplies products to the market both through a direct (integrated) sales channel and through the remaining retailers. Different types of competition are considered for the retailers, namely volume competition, price competition, and no competition. The operations policies of the vendor and the retailers are considered explicitly in this paper by taking account of inventory carrying, setup and ordering costs that result from production and ordering decisions. We compare the pre-merger situation to the situation after the merger and show under which conditions the merger is beneficial to the vendor, the retailers, the supply chain, and the consumers. The results of our paper indicate that the type of competition is of major importance for the structure of the supply chain after the merger, and that under certain conditions, the merger may benefit all parties involved, i.e. the vendor, the retailers, and the consumers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.