Abstract

The conversion of tropical habitats has dramatic implications on biodiversity and represents one of the greatest conservation challenges of our time. Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests (SDTF), which are disjointly distributed throughout the Neotropics, are especially susceptible to human activities. The Caatinga Dry Forest, located in the semi-arid interior of northeastern Brazil, represents not only the largest and most biologically diverse nucleus of SDTF, but also the world’s most densely populated semi-arid region, with ever-growing pressure on its natural resources. To prevent illegal logging, conservation agencies looked at forest management, where an area is divided in smaller stands which are gradually logged and allowed to regrow for a period of time, when a new cutting cycle should reinitiate. The impacts of these management schemes on biodiversity, however, remain largely untested. We conducted standardized avian surveys to evaluate the effects of forest management on the avian community at a 1,670 ha privately owned property located on the Chapada do Araripe, northeastern Brazil. This area was divided in 22 forest stands, half of which had already been logged at the time of our sampling, creating a gradient of logged and natural forests and an 11-yr chrono-sequence of forest regeneration. Our results show that logged areas present fewer individuals, fewer species, and different avian assemblages than unlogged forests. Such differences are mostly driven by forest-dependent species, which were overwhelmingly affected by forest management. Our results show that although logged forests tend to recover its height after a decade, they do not recover the originally forest cover, measured by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. Likewise, decade-long recovering stands continue to show lower species richness, lower bird abundance, and different avian composition than unlogged forests. We identified a set of bird species that are more affected by forest management (ecological losers) and a group of birds that apparently benefit from the referred changes in land use (ecological winners). We conclude that completely managing an entire area may cause the extirpation of several forest-dependent species. We therefore suggest keeping logged and unlogged plots intermingled, to avoid local extinctions and the complete modification of the original avifauna.

Highlights

  • Halting the conversion of natural habitats into anthropogenic landscapes represents one of the greatest challenges of the twentyfirst century

  • We evaluate the effect of a forest management scheme at a privately owned property located in the semi-arid interior of northeastern Brazil, where a network of trails subdivided the area in 22 different forest stands

  • We found that species composition in logged regenerated areas remained distinct from unlogged areas, even after over a decade of forest recovery (Supplementary Figure 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Halting the conversion of natural habitats into anthropogenic landscapes represents one of the greatest challenges of the twentyfirst century This is true for tropical regions, which concentrate most of the planet’s biodiversity (Laurance, 2007; Blackman et al, 2014). Dry tropical forests are subject to multiple threats, often simultaneously, including habitat fragmentation, fire, wood harvesting, conversion to croplands, and climate change (Miles et al, 2006; Antongiovanni et al, 2020). Despite those pressures, SDTF are often considered resilient habitats, because they tend to recover their original stature faster than wet forests (Vieira and Scariot, 2006). From wet forests, where soft-wooded tree species dominate the early succession period, dry forest early succession conditions can be harsh, and only tolerated by slow-growing hard-wooded species (Poorter et al, 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.