Abstract
This paper explores, both theoretically and empirically, how firing costs affect worker productivity and turnover. We develop a model in which workers are essential to knowledge transfer between firms and worker effort is firm-specific in the sense that a worker can be fired before reaping the full return from effort (i.e., before acquiring all of the potential knowledge valuable to competing firms). Our model shows that the hold-up risk faced by workers induces them to curtail their innovative effort. However, an increase in firing costs inhibits the firm's ability to hold up the worker and thereby leads the worker to exert higher effort. The increased productivity, in turn, affects turnover, and the magnitude of this effect depends primarily on the degree to which the worker's knowledge stock is transferable to competing firms. In our empirical analysis, we consider the passage of the wrongful discharge laws in the US as an exogenous increase in firing costs. Using individual-level data constructed from patents issued to inventors by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we find supporting evidence for the model's implications.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.