Abstract
AbstractThis study evaluated the effects of feeding alfalfa and pods of tree legumes on rumen pH and ammonia concentration as well as in sacco degradability of dry matter and fibre constituents of maize stover, alfalfa hay and their neutral detergent extracts. The feeds were incubated in the rumens of five South African Merino sheep fed individually in an incomplete (5 × 4) Latin square design using five diets. The diets comprised equal proportions of pasture hay and either alfalfa (Alfalfa diet) or pods of Acacia sieberiana (Sieberiana diet), Acacia nilotica (Nilotica diet) or Leucaena leucocephala (Leucaena diet). The fifth diet was composed of pasture hay alone (Hay diet) and served as a negative control. Supplementation of hay with either legume pods or alfalfa significantly (p < 0.05) increased rumen ammonia concentration from 56 to a maximum of 86 mg l−1. The pH of the rumen fluid ranged between 6.2 and 6.5 for all diets, but variations in pH were not significant. Diet did not affect (p > 0.05) the degradability constants lag time (LT), slowly degradable fraction (B), potential degradability (PD), effective degradability (ED) and rate of degradation (C) of dry matter (DM) but significantly (p < 0.01) affected ED of the fibre constituents of the incubated feeds. The effective degradabilities of the incubated feeds differed (p < 0.001), with alfalfa and maize stover having average values of 555 and 318 g kg−1 DM respectively. The rate of degradation of alfalfa was also higher (p < 0.01) than that of maize stover. Neutral detergent extraction improved ED of the cell wall constituents of maize stover but produced the opposite effect for alfalfa. The interactions between incubation feed and extract were significant (p < 0.01) for ED and C of neutral detergent fibre and hemicellulose. The observations show that pods from tree legumes are comparable to alfalfa in the provision of rumen ammonia but limit microbial activity in the degradability of fibre constituents. They also show that maize stover and alfalfa differ in their degradabilities and that the differences may be attributed to their cell wall chemistry.© 2001 Society of Chemical Industry
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.