Abstract

Traditionally, insects collected for scientific purposes have been dried and pinned, or preserved in 70% ethanol. Both methods preserve taxonomically informative exoskeletal structures well but are suboptimal for preserving DNA for molecular biology. Highly concentrated ethanol (95–100%), preferred as a DNA preservative, has generally been assumed to make specimens brittle and prone to breaking. However, systematic studies on the correlation between ethanol concentration and specimen preservation are lacking. Here, we tested how preservative ethanol concentration in combination with different sample handling regimes affect the integrity of seven insect species representing four orders, and differing substantially in the level of sclerotization. After preservation and treatments (various levels of disturbance), we counted the number of appendages (legs, wings, antennae, or heads) that each specimen had lost. Additionally, we assessed the preservation of DNA after long-term storage by comparing the ratio of PCR amplicon copy numbers to an added artificial standard. We found that high ethanol concentrations indeed induce brittleness in insects. However, the magnitude and nature of the effect varied strikingly among species. In general, ethanol concentrations at or above 90% made the insects more brittle, but for species with robust, thicker exoskeletons, this did not translate to an increased loss of appendages. Neither freezing the samples nor drying the insects after immersion in ethanol had a negative effect on the retention of appendages. However, the morphology of the insects was severely damaged if they were allowed to dry. We also found that DNA preserves less well at lower ethanol concentrations when stored at room temperature for an extended period. However, the magnitude of the effect varies among species; the concentrations at which the number of COI amplicon copies relative to the standard was significantly decreased compared to 95% ethanol ranged from 90% to as low as 50%. While higher ethanol concentrations positively affect long-term DNA preservation, there is a clear trade-off between preserving insects for morphological examination and genetic analysis. The optimal ethanol concentration for the latter is detrimental for the former, and vice versa. These trade-offs need to be considered in large insect biodiversity surveys and other projects aiming to combine molecular work with traditional morphology-based characterization of collected specimens.

Highlights

  • The first records of the use of ethanol for the preservation of animal tissue date back to the mid 1600s, when Robert Boyle mentions that he successfully used the ‘‘Spirit of Wine’’ to preserve blood and soft parts of a human body, as well as a fish, for many months (Boyle, 1664)

  • Only the generic names will be used on in the article. Adults of these species represent a wide range of body shapes, cuticle hardness levels, and responses to varying ethanol concentrations and treatments based on anecdotal information and prior observations

  • For the DNA preservation analysis, we considered a linear model was fitted to the data with a logarithm-transformed estimated number of cytochrome oxidase I (COI) target copies as a function of two factors: Species and Ethanol Concentration, and their interaction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The first records of the use of ethanol for the preservation of animal tissue date back to the mid 1600s, when Robert Boyle mentions that he successfully used the ‘‘Spirit of Wine’’ to preserve blood and soft parts of a human body, as well as a fish, for many months (Boyle, 1664). Other preservative liquids, for example acetone (Fukatsu, 1999), or fundamentally different approaches such as silica-drying or ultrafreezing (

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call