Abstract
This study investigates how effectively a forced CEO turnover mitigates a firm's distress risk amplified by a bad reputation for its Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices. We find that a firm's CEO dismissal decision significantly reduces the level of its distress risk—measured by Altman's Z-Score—subsequent to negative media coverage of the firm's ESG practices. This suggests that the forced CEO turnover may be taken as an ex-post damage instrument. Additional results show that the mitigation effect of CEO dismissal is stronger in firms under greater market scrutiny conditioned on various mechanisms: market competition, sin stock industry, and analyst coverage.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
