The effect of epinephrine versus methoxamine on regional myocardial blood flow and defibrillation rates following a prolonged cardiorespiratory arrest in a swine model

Abstract

Recent studies in swine have shown that larger doses of epinephrine than those currently employed for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly improve regional myocardial blood flow following prolonged cardiac arrest. The dose-response effect of a pure alpha-adrenergic agonist, methoxamine, on regional myocardial blood flow has not been investigated in this setting. This study compared the effect of high-dose epinephrine with graded doses of methoxamine on regional myocardial blood flow, oxygen delivery/utilization, and defibrillation rates during CPR. Twenty swine were instrumented for regional myocardial blood flow measurements using radiolabeled tracer microspheres. Measurements of regional myocardial blood flow, oxygen delivery, and oxygen consumption were made during normal sinus rhythm. Ventricular fibrillation was then induced. Following 10 minutes of ventricular fibrillation, CPR was initiated with a pneumatic compressor. Regional myocardial blood flow, oxygen delivery, and oxygen consumption were then measured during CPR. Following 3 minutes of CPR, the swine were allocated to one of four treatment groups (five per group): group I, epinephrine 0.2 mg/kg; group II, methoxamine 0.1 mg/kg; group III, methoxamine 1.0 mg/kg; and group IV, methoxamine 10.0 mg/kg. One minute after drug administration, regional myocardial blood flow, oxygen delivery, and oxygen consumption measurements again were made. Three and one half minutes after drug administration, defibrillation was attempted. Regional myocardial blood flow following drug administration was compared using an analysis of covariance. Epinephrine (0.2 mg/kg) significantly improved myocardial blood flow ( P < .002) for all tissues examined compared with all doses of methoxamine. Successful defibrillation rates were also higher in the group receiving 0.2 mg/kg of epinephrine (80%) than in those groups receiving 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mg/kg of methoxamine (20%, 0%, and 0%, respectively). This difference may reflect an improvement in myocardial oxygen delivery over oxygen utilization.