Abstract

Introduction: One of the health system concerns is the use of medications for pain relief during labor and its side effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of epiduralspinal anesthesia (combined anesthesia [CA]) on labor outcome and satisfaction in pregnant women. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial study, we included 80 nulliparous women who had been admitted to Fatemieh hospital (Hamadan, Iran) during 2015-2016 due to spontaneous onset of labor. They were randomly assigned into 2 groups of 40, one group with CA versus normal vaginal delivery (NVD) group. Data were collected by using of demographic questionnaire, satisfaction questionnaire, and baby truck scales. Data were analyzed by descriptive and analytical statistics in SPSS version 16.0. Results: Average maternal age (mean ± SD) in the CA group was 26.94 ± 4.34 and in the NVD group was 25.89 ±5.18, respectively. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of length of second stage of labor (P=0.001), headache (P=0.04), and Apgar score (first minute) (P=0.001). Chi-square test showed a significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of satisfaction with childbirth (P=0.004). Conclusion: In this study, labor pain relief by using the spinal-epidural anesthesia (CA) increased the labor satisfaction. Nevertheless, this approach was associated with some maternal and neonatal complications such as: headaches, length of third stage of labor, and low Apgar score. It seems that the use of this method for painless delivery requires further studies.

Highlights

  • One of the health system concerns is the use of medications for pain relief during labor and its side effects

  • Studies have shown that the fear of labor pain and less pain in cesarean section are the main reasons for the refusal of vaginal delivery in pregnant women

  • Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that our data followed a normal distribution for the length of active phase of labor (P = 0.08), the length of second phase (P = 0.45), the length of third stage of labor (P = 0.28), Apgar score (P = 0.35), Apgar score (P = 0.09), start time of breast-feeding after birth (P = 0.06), the volume of postpartum hemorrhage (P = 0.24), headache after delivery (P = 0.34), and the use of delivery appliances (P = 0.5)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the health system concerns is the use of medications for pain relief during labor and its side effects. Conclusion: In this study, labor pain relief by using the spinal-epidural anesthesia (CA) increased the labor satisfaction This approach was associated with some maternal and neonatal complications such as: headaches, length of third stage of labor, and low Apgar score. Among the factors that affect labor pain perception and response are the number and type of deliveries, fetal size, and position of the fetus in the womb.[2,3] Fear of labor pain leads to the increased secretion of catecholamines (stress hormones), subsequent reduction in the efficiency of uterine contractions, prolongation of the delivery process, reduction in blood supply to the uterus, and fetal hypoxia These in turn may lead to the increased incidence of obstetric interventions and the increase in the likelihood of the need for emergency cesarean.[4,5,6,7] Studies have shown that the fear of labor pain and less pain in cesarean section are the main reasons for the refusal of vaginal delivery in pregnant women. Two groups were matched for age, pthreevpehnatiromnacooflothgiecanleagnadtivneone-fpfehcatrsmoafcsotlroegsiscahl omrmethoondess on randeodmulcyatdiiovnid,eedmipntlooyimnteernvtesnttaiotuns,angedstcaotniotrnoal lgarogue,pas,nd body tmctipthonohruemceerslveuucmueddlttnueeeoetscrrin,ieiotnnhnateehemnoedpprefllaldaatfapbhcaiciceoecdeanirnnlltdipateteaalamgciltapnlietipoe.nitvrTneheferhuofooeesudfffibsosfeiclenoachni,btnsiesorl,fedroiultrbfasespixsiloraanattfirtxhgnemiao,.stsnetiOrdhoehoidnneocfuearomtclchotmfoioefomtnenhpttebhheesiaeolnvnopdiamndcestliovoisnct and size mtwhiaasssaspriepncrdroueaixcteh(dBw.MaTswIc)o.ongtrinouuepds until the desired sample were matched for age, emdauscsIanitnicodlunes,xieo(mBnMpalnoI)yd.mEexnctlustsaitouns,Cgreistteartiioanal age, and body omf uasncleesst,haentdicsfac(icliotamtiboninaotfiochnildobfirsthp.inOanl eaonfetshtheemsioastand Inclusion criteria were: pregnant women who had age ecpoimdumroanl anmeesdthiceasliam).9eTthhoidssmiesthuosdinigs utsheed cinomcobminbatiinoantion Incluosfio1n8atnod 3E5xcyluesairosn, sCirnigtelreitaon pregnancies, gestational age wofithanaenstihnectricesm(ecnotmobfininatteionnsitoyfosfplianbaolrapnaeisnthiensitaheanadctive Inclubseiotwnecernite3r7ia–4w2erwe:eepkrse,gnceanpthawliocmperneswenhtoathioand (aOgeA), BMI pehpaidsueroalfalnaebsothre(swiah).e9nThtihsemceetrhvoidxisisusoepdeinn cboemtwbeineanti4onto 6 of 18bettow3e5enye1a9rs.[8], stiong2le6t,oannpdrengonramncaile-sw, egiegshtattioofnfaeltuagsebetween cwmit)h.4aEnpinidcurermale-nspt ionfailntaennessityheosfilaabiosrapahinighinlythsepaecctiiavleized betw2e5e0n037g–a4n2dw4ee0k0s0, cge.pEhaxlcilcupsiroensenctraitieornia(OwAer)e, BdMelIivery via tpehchasneiqouf elabthoart(wbehneenfitthsefcroermvixliitstleopuesneboeftwpeaeinn-4retloie6ving betweemener1g9e.8nctoy 2c6e,sarnedanosremctailo-wne(igChSt)o, fpfreotulosnbgeetwdeleanbor (>18 acnmd).4anEepsitdhuersaila-spmineadlicaanteisotnhse,siaasiswaelhligahslyhsigpheciaacliczeesds to 2500hoguarnsdt4h0e00dugr. aEtxiocnlusoiofnthcreitefririastwaenreddseelicvoenrydvpiahases of etpecidhunriqaul eantehsatthbeesinaefaintsdfcroomntilnitutlaetiuosneooffapnaeisnt-hreesliieavdinugring emerdgeelnivceyryceosrar>e2anhoseucrtsiotnhe(sCeSc)o, npdrosltoanggeeodfllaabboorr)(,>g1e8stational laanbdor.a1n0 eSsotmheesisatumdeiedsichaativoenssh, oaws nwtehllatatshehiugshe oacfcceosms btoined hourcsomthpelidcuartiaotinonsuocf htheasfirosltigaonhdydsreacmonndiopsh, asperseeocflampsia, aenpeidstuhreasliaan(eCstAhe)slieaaadnsdtcoonantininuactrieoanseofinanceasethseasrieaadnusreincgtion, delivienrfyecotri>on2 ,hohuyrpsetrhteensescioonnd, sgteasgteaotifolnabaol rd),igaebsettaetisonoarl chronic pauapalnarsnnrboedoedollsaoohrhtp.nhny1yp0eggppSsleeeeiioddaarrmtnt(hhsscCeeeeeecrAscrsmotmo)unsnidludaiedai,cae1,hsd1s1ts1slhatoalagtaowsogevweveeaoreansforhcAiufolAnpawucglbpamranogebrraato,shdsrrcepae,ostolicripntsveohto,ecrpe1s2reaauty,earp1ssnt2aeaaudarnrmonetdtfuahdcnmhefootesmnhraehecedcbeeetaindinpacoedehstne.doea1,d3chItnoe cidanonisfmyeecadaapmtsnnliieioseyecsenda,sai,ttmacsihohcaeeetntyssidi,pvoiiaeenasc,rucaotdcttterioihunvopprseniiiaanocsosangdsrli,uvoppirgelrniieaegnfsssgoemgtsnachitoavtypiinkeodorcenrensryagams,mln,ohoarndhinksiiisaostceoetbsryopr,es,ryts,yephishsorioefsiaofstetaotrcrolrletlacreyhcmhyreegriopvooyefsinfnnitaiaogtrc,lrelaecnregicvyeintoogf cuosnetarpasptl,iasnocmesesuocthhears svtaucduiuems hdaevlievesrhyoawnnd ftohractepuss.i1n3 gInthis anestthheesniae,etdolpeicianl tihnefewctaioisnt,ohresmeposrirshaatgtihcedeisnetarasensc,ecoirfculatory mcoenthtroasdt,osfoamnealogtehseiar dstouedsiensohtaavfefeschtobwirnththoauttucosimngest.h11isThe the npeleadteleleitn ltohseswoairst,syhsetmemorirchaagnictidcoisaegauselsa,nctircduislaetaosreys of the amimethoof tdhoisf astnuadlgyewsiaasdtooesasnsoetsasfmfecattebrinrtahl oanutdcofemtaelso.11uTtchoemes plateblelot oldos,s borraisnystesmpaicceanstpicaosamgu, laannt adtoismeaisceasl odf isthoerders of ianimpaorfttuhriisesntut dmyowthasetros awssheossumnadternwaelnatnCd fAetdaluoruintcgomlabesor. blootdh,e bsrpaine,spanacde loswpasbmlo, odanavtoolmumicael

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call