Abstract
Pulse oximeters are known to be inaccurate in the presence of elevated concentrations of carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin. This paper attempts to alleviate some of the confusion that exists between fractional and functional saturation, and to clarify the comparison of each with SpO2. A series of theoretical relationships between pulse oximeter reading (SpO2) and actual oxygen saturation (both fractional and functional) is derived using simple absorption theory. The theoretical relationships are checked using an experimental in vitro test system. This consists of a blood circuit containing a model finger, capable of simulating the pulsatile transmission signals through a real finger. Theoretical predictions and experimental results are compared and are found to agree well in the presence of carboxyhemoglobin, but less well with methemoglobin. Possible reasons are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
