The effect of different inferior mesenteric artery ligation levels and different lymph node dissection areas on the short- and long-term outcomes of rectal cancer.

Abstract

Surgery is the most effective treatment for rectal cancer patients, but its key steps, including selection of the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation and removal of 253 lymph nodes, are still inconclusive. This study aimed to analyze the effects of different surgical methods, including levels of ligation (low vs. high) and lymph node dissection areas (D2 vs. D3) on the short-term and long-term outcomes. Between March 2014 and August 2018, 253 rectal cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed; 113 patients underwent low ligation D2 lymph node dissection (LLD2), 75 patients underwent low ligation D3 lymph node dissection (LLD3), and 65 patients underwent high ligation (HL). We compared the short-term and long-term outcomes among the different groups. There were no significant differences among the groups in terms of the intraoperative variables, including operative time, blood transfusion, and conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. The median blood loss was significantly lower in LLD3 (50 mL) than in LLD2 (100 mL) and HL (100 mL), but it was not significantly different between LLD2 and HL. There were no significant differences among the LLD2, LLD3, and HL groups in the incidence of postoperative complications (9.7% vs. 12.0% vs. 10.8%, respectively) and hospital stay (14 vs. 15 vs. 14, respectively). The anastomotic leakage Clavien-Dindo grade was significantly lower with LLD2 and LLD3 than with HL, but it was the same between LLD2 and LLD3. The total number of lymph nodes harvested in the LLD3 group (n=14) was higher than that in the LLD2 group (n=12), but it was not significantly different than that in the HL group (n=13). There were no significant differences among the groups in terms of 3-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate. Low ligation was similar to HL in terms of major intraoperative and postoperative parameters, but it can reduce the severity of anastomotic leakage to a certain extent. D3 lymph node dissection can increase the total number of lymph nodes harvested, but it did not improve long-term prognosis.