Abstract
Objectives: Analyzing the influence of different filling methods on the microleakage of posterior teeth during the treatment of bulk resin filling. Methods: From January 2019 to January 2020, 68 patients with posterior tooth filling (123 teeth) in our hospital were selected and randomly assigned into three groups (A, B, and C), with 41 teeth in each group. Group A received bulk posterior teeth filling resin treatment, group B received Charisma® resin filling treatment and group C received FX-? filling treatment. The curative effect and microleakage of posterior teeth between the groups were compared. Results: Comparison of treatment efficiency in group A (97.56%), group B (85.37%) and group C (73.17%) shows that P?0.05?comparison of microleakage value and operation time of group A, group B and group C shows that P?0.05. Conclusions: In resin filling treatment, bulk posterior tooth filling resin material should be selected for its high hardness, strong edge adhesion, and natural effects.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
