The Effect of Diet on Colony Recognition and Cuticular Hydrocarbon Profiles of the Invasive Argentine Ant, Linepithema humile.

Abstract

Simple SummaryThe membership of social insect colonies is defined by chemical pheromones on the bodies of colony members. In nearly all ant species that have been studied, these pheromones have been shown to be genetically based. In some cases, however, environmentally derived odors have been implicated as colony recognition cues. The widely introduced and invasive Argentine ant is well known for forming massive “supercolonies” in its introduced ranges. Previous studies have implicated both genetic and diet-derived chemicals in the colony recognition systems of introduced populations. Here, we perform feeding experiments, in both realistic field settings and the lab, and show that dietary changes do not cause behavioral changes in the field, as well as under most laboratory conditions. However, one exception was found, in which reduced aggression was recorded in one of the laboratory feeding treatments (with crickets as the dietary item), but, nevertheless, not of sufficient magnitude to explain the unusual colony structure of introduced Argentine ants. We conclude that dietary shifts during introduction to new ranges do not account for the origin of Argentine ant supercolonies.Ants are some of the most abundant and ecologically successful terrestrial organisms, and invasive ants rank among the most damaging invasive species. The Argentine ant is a particularly well-studied invader, in part, because of the extreme social structure, known as unicoloniality, that occurs in introduced populations. Unicoloniality is characterized by the formation of geographically vast supercolonies, within which territorial behavior and intraspecific aggression are absent. Although there is considerable evidence supporting a genetic basis for the odor cues involved in colony recognition, some studies have suggested that diet may also influence colony recognition cues and, thus, colony structure. Here, we test the role for insect-derived recognition cues by performing a diet supplementation experiment in a natural field setting, and a more extreme dietary manipulation experiment in the lab. After one month, in both the field and the lab, we found that aggressive supercolonies remained aggressive toward each other and non-aggressive nests (from the same supercolony) remained non-aggressive, regardless of dietary treatment. In one lab treatment, we did observe a significant decrease in the level of aggression between different supercolonies that were fed the same diet, but aggression was still frequent. We did not see any evidence for cuticular hydrocarbon odor cues being transferred from prey to ants in any of the field treatments. In the more extreme lab treatment, however, several cuticular hydrocarbons were acquired from both roach and cricket insect prey (but not Drosophila). Based on these data, we conclude that dietary changes are unlikely to underlie changes in behavior or colony structure in Argentine ants in real-world settings. However, these results indicate that caution is warranted when interpreting the behaviors of animals that have been reared on diets that are substantially different from natural populations.