Abstract

For group‐foraging ungulates, forage is generally widely and relatively evenly dispersed. However, for free‐ranging red deer Cervus elaphus supplementary winter feeding provides distinct patches of predictable food. These patches differ in size, but also in temporal distribution and depletion rate. Interference competition is known to increase with increasing spatial clumping (decreasing patch size), but the influence of temporal clumping and the predictability of food occurrence has received much less attention. Therefore in this study we investigated the effects of different degrees of spatial and temporal clumping of food on interference competition during feeding. Patch size was the main parameter influencing participation in feeding as well as interference competition during feeding on the respective patch. Temporal dispersion and the predictability of food occurrence were however, important parameters for the timing of aggressive interactions. Generally, aggression occurs during feeding and increases with decreasing patch size. But when depletion rate was high food availability was predictably short and the patch occurred predictably (such as hay), middle ranking stags increased aggression already prior to feeding at the respective patch. We suggest that in this way they confirmed hierarchy outside feeding on the quickly depleted patch and as a result gained actual feeding time when feeding on the respective patch. With the patch occurring predictably but varying in size the number of participating subordinates varied concomitantly with variation in patch size. Subordinates assessed patch profitability and left without having fed when patch size was too small for an efficient participation. When patch size was predictably small enough to be defended exclusively (feed blocks), subordinate stags did not assess profitability each time but did not participate at all in feeding at the respective patch. The relative importance of these various food‐related parameters (patch size depletion rate, predictability) influencing feeding competition and the timing of aggression will vary with group size, rank, alternative food sources, physical characteristics of the food as well as different hierarchy systems of the feeding animals.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.